Young people formerly held in police watch houses claim their human rights were breached

  • 📰 abc730
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Three young people are taking on the Queensland government with a legal case claiming their human rights were breached when they were locked up in police watch houses. michaelatkin abc730

Katie Acheson is speaking out because she is worried about the harm caused by extended custody in a watch house."I had a young female recently, she was 16 and she was in the watch house," she said.

Five nights a week, they check on their safety and offer them a lift home before there's any trouble.Pita Taimani's outreach team is focused on keeping at-risk youth out of police custody. The complaints sent to Queensland Police and the Department of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural Affairs last year expressed concerns about whether "systemic capacity issues in youth detention centres" are leading to young people being in extended custody in watch houses.

"The QPS Watchhouse environment is not suitable for children and young people's safety and wellbeing," one complaint reads.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 14. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

‘My family was invisible’: April has filed a human rights complaint over the censusA LGBTIQ advocacy group says that the 2021 census failed to ask about sexual orientation, gender diversity and variations. niltiac It does not matter what someone identifies as. It matters what someone is. Subjective truth (belief you are something you are not) is NOT objective truth (something you are). niltiac Why? So you can force everybody to spill their most private details to the government? I’d have refused to answer such invasive questions on principle. My sexual preferences and physical characteristics are none of anyone else’s business, certainly not the bureau of statistics niltiac These forms are antiquated, it is an invasion of my privacy for a start, the Taxation Office know who I am, The Department of Immigration know who I am as I've travelled overseas and have a passport, the Electoral Office know who I am. Now they want us to fill in another form
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »