Opinion | Endangered Species Habitat Check

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Opinion: The Supreme Court rules 8-0 against a federal land grab for the dusky gopher frog

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Interesting that it's a 'land grab' when the purpose is to preserve & protect unspoiled land for the benefit of citizens, wildlife & the health of our environment. When privateers grab land, exploit it for resources & destroy the environment for profit, it's healthy capitalism.

Good...now let's find some way to preserve it without violating the constitution...ideas?

Does that mean frogs can’t vote anymore? Lol

Bye frog. Soon there will be a Costco and a Chilie's where you used to live, fwiw.

A victory for those who support limited government. Lefties will predictably be enraged. MAGA

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

EU court adviser to publish opinion on Brexit reversibility case on Dec. 4The advocate general of the European Union's top court will give his opinio... 👀👀👀 Here we go
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court limits Endangered Species Act: Habitat must contain endangered speciesThe Supreme Court has limited the reach of the Endangered Species Act, ruling that a habitat can't be a future home to endangered species; they must live there now. Because they’re all esteemed scientists in the fields of biology, genetics, environmental studies, climatologists, etc. ?!? Hmm need think about this one. Holy shit?!?!?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court limits habitats protected under the Endangered Species ActSupreme Court limits the reach of the Endangered Species Act. The habitat can't be a protected home to endangered species if it not suitable for them to live there now. On a 8-0 vote. Rather solid decision.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »