ClickBait FakeNews
That’s one way to interpret it. You’d be completely wrong though. You folks ever considered doing some fact checking?
So was it that you didn't read it and took your SJW intern's word for it, or you did read it but didn't understand it?
Wrong. READ the judgment!
This is literally a lie. You've literally said the exact opposite of the ruling. What the actual fuck is wrong with you? FakeNews
As a biologist I understand what’s said here. But! Im not sure the does
And . . what was the vote? Drumroll pls . . 8-0 Funny, that's not mentioned. See a pattern here?
No, it doesn't surprise me. Journalists have turned into democrat activists with bylines, so spreading misinformation is their sacred responsibility now.
Since the LA Times article was limited, what is the real decision?
There is more to it than what is listed above but its the age of twitter, its all about clicks and let the facts be damned. Below is a link to the actual SC ruling. Also, it was an 8-0 decision with Kavanaugh not participating.
Liars. from the decision.......'Habitat can, of course, include areas where the species does not currently live, given that the statute defines critical habitat to include unoccupied areas.'
......and habitat will change as the climate changes, correct ? I *think* that’s why we elect people to Congress, to pass and update legislation as needed......? Hopefully based on science that includes the BIG picture ?
Read it before commenting. Headline doesn’t match article. They are getting you to react for the comments
Everyone getting upset about this, don’t be a useful idiot, and just read the decision. The headline is misleading.
EnigmaNetxx Shame on the SCOTUS for this narrow and limited decision protecting all species where they currently live but not migrate to in the future.
So, first we chase away, hunt, and pollute a species till it's endangered; and then we say it's 'their fault' if they're no longer in their habitat, and that the results of our greedy actions should justify forbidding them their home forever? SCOTUS: that's not justice. SMH.
And the protections for animals environment workers and other people will roll back. Welcome to the Gilded Age.
Holy shit?!?!?
Got no respect for The Supreme Court.
Because they’re all esteemed scientists in the fields of biology, genetics, environmental studies, climatologists, etc. ?!?
Hmm need think about this one.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Dusky gopher frog suffers setback at Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court dealt a setback to the endangered dusky gopher frog on Tuesday, wiping away a lower court opinion that favored protections for the three-inch amphibian and directing the lower courts to take another look at how the Fish and Wildlife Service acted to protect land for the vanishing species. U top ❤️❤️🔥
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court deals a setback to the endangered dusky gopher frogThe ruling helped landowners objecting to the designation of their property as critical habitat. Fuck that frog. Property right amphibians What sort of headline is this? A court tried to tell a landowner he could not build on his property because it could *potentially* be a future home to a frog, which lives in a neighboring state. I feel bad for the frog but this law was way overstepping. Sorry, Obama.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court limits habitats protected under the Endangered Species ActSupreme Court limits the reach of the Endangered Species Act. The habitat can't be a protected home to endangered species if it not suitable for them to live there now. On a 8-0 vote. Rather solid decision.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court to Rule on Kavanaugh Appeals Court SEC CaseSupreme Court justices on Monday will effectively be asked to rule on the jurisprudence of their newest colleague in a fraud case that tests how far the SEC can go in holding stockbrokers accountable for disseminating false statements to clients. Yeah now why would we want to police that Cheesy grin on that rat. Of course he did. Why he was nominated by realDonaldTrump
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court gives victory to Planned Parenthood in Medicaid caseThree of the court's conservatives said the court should have taken up the case, but Justice Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts voted with the majority. And Kavanaugh was the deciding vote, he’s a republican judge right?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, released from hospital after lung cancer surgeryThe Supreme Court justice is recuperating at home before court is in session again Jan. 7. Don’t include the age for a living person Most people prefer to die at home even SATANIST The CIA Controlled Washington Post is the ENEMY of the PEOPLE Lung cancer.... . . . . . . . 90% of America knows what that means. . . . . .
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Trump blasts judge's ruling blocking asylum restrictions, predicts Supreme Court winPres. Trump angrily criticizes federal judge's ruling blocking new restrictions on asylum, calling the court 'not fair' and predicting he would win in the Supreme Court. Of course it was fair! 🤡realDonaldTrump condones murder, then explains it's okay for his daughter to do what he wanted Hillary Clinton locked up for. Oh, and his AG is a fucking crook. Impeach. LET'S GET STARTED 😏 POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP is absolutely right....! Period.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »