- The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear a case that could dramatically change the way elections for Congress and the presidency are conducted, handing more power to state legislatures and blocking state courts from reviewing challenges to the procedures and results.
In the most extreme example, attorneys said, if the court rules no entity besides state legislatures can set rules regarding federal elections, that could stop a governor from vetoing election bills, or a state court from blocking rules that set up different voting hours in urban and rural precincts.
It only takes four of the nine justices to agree to hear a case. A majority of five is needed for an eventual decision. The case comes as state courts have become increasingly involved in redistricting, the consequence of a 2019 decision in which the Supreme Court said federal courts could no longer handle claims of illegal partisan gerrymandering. Initially, in cases in states like North Carolina and Pennsylvania, that hurt Republicans and helped Democrats.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court to hear case on state authority over electionsThe justices will consider whether state courts, finding violations of their state constitutions, can order changes to federal elections and the once-a-decade redrawing of congressional districts.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear case on state authority over electionsThe Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from North Carolina Republicans that could drastically limit state court authority over congressional redistricting, as well as elections for Congress and the presidency Time to have one vote per person. Let's be done with the fu**** up electoral college!
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to hear case on state authority over electionsThe Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from North Carolina Republicans that could drastically limit state court authority over congressional redistricting, as well as elections for Congress and the presidency
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court to Hear Case on State Lawmakers’ Power Over ElectionsThe high court agrees to consider an election-law case examining whether state lawmakers can adopt voting rules for federal elections without oversight by state courts.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court will hear case on states’ power in federal electionsThe Supreme Court will hear a case next term that could give state legislatures the power to set the rules for federal elections — even if they result in partisan gerrymandering or violate state constitutions. votolatino Blklivesmatter | keep your eyes on this decision. Of course they will, is anybody surprised? America is run by 9 people. When SCOTUS becomes political (and 3 have already lied) then just 9 people can change the face of the country. SCOTUS shouldn’t be Republican or Democrat, it should be ethical and represent all Americans. The outcome is only slightly harder to foretell than the trial of Alexy Navalny.
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Houston-Dallas railway gets eminent domain victory in Texas Supreme CourtThe state Supreme Court ruled that a planned high-speed rail project can use eminent...
Source: ExpressNews - 🏆 519. / 51 Read more »