Do Bots Have First Amendment Rights?

And, are corporations 'people'?

This is insanity

Cruellaisdevine Not if they try crossing the southern border...

Sort of like corporations are “people”... 😫

Legal rights w/o social responsibility, imo. Bot rights vs CA disclosure law: 'free speech rights of corporations; the right against being compelled to say something, as opposed to being banned from saying something; the right to anonymous speech; and finally, the right to lie.'

Arriadna Oh pleeeeeeze GUAAFB

Is a bot a single individual or a computer-generated action? This seems like the stupid decision that corporations are people with religious-liberty rights.

POLITICOMag ...then the law is wrong and needs to be changed to one with common sense.

The obvious answer for Truth - is that a bot should have to introduce itself as a bot before it says anything Anything else undermines public trust in all real people

What is the 1A value for listeners in allowing anonymous automated speech? [There is negative value, in fact.]

Now that’s just wrong !

We will not be silenced

WTF?!?!?!!

Who gave them rights? Probably the bots judges

The more important question is : 'Does the 1st amendment guarantee Right to ANONYMOUS free speech?'

Bots have no rights

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Federal appeals court rules against another immigration crackdown attemptA federal appeals court ruled that part of a law that makes it a crime to encourage foreigners to enter or live in the United States illegally violates the First Amendment 'Dadgum 9th Circuit.' 'Can I fire them?' HarmlessYardDog Tear it all down Aiding and abetting someone break the law is okay then?
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Perspective | Hate speech is showing up in schools. Censorship isn’t the answer.Saluting Nazis or kneeling against racism: Which students get First Amendment rights? Lets debate the nazi. It worked well the 1st time Check my pulse. I agree with a WaPo headline. So, schools can punish a kid for holding a “bong hits 4 Jesus” sign at an off-campus event (SCOTUS has said so) but not for spouting hate speech that demeans and threatens their classmates, is that what you’re saying?
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

No talk of ‘the Resistance’ or opinions about impeachment at work, federal employees are warnedSome government watchdogs fear the new federal guidance will chill First Amendment rights and whistle-blowing. So much for your 1st amendment rights. So much for freedom of speech....
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »