has ended constitutional protections for abortion
It puts the court at odds with a majority of Americans who favored preserving Roe, according to opinion polls. Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — the diminished liberal wing of the court — were in dissent. In roughly a half-dozen other states, the fight will be over dormant abortion bans that were enacted before Roe was decided in 1973 or new proposals to sharply limit when abortions can be performed, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that supports abortion rights.
But Alito wrote in his draft opinion that his analysis addresses abortion only, not other rights that also stem from a right to privacy that the high court has found implicit, though not directly stated, in the Constitution. Abortion is different, Alito wrote, because of the unique moral question it poses.
protectED*
If you thought Trump wouldn't leave a legacy, here it is!
Glory to God in the Highest
Funny how your tweet assumes the 'right' to an extremely questionable moral issue. Next y'all be saying we have a right to suicide.
Babies lives matter
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Lametti may ask Supreme Court to define ‘notwithstanding’ rulesacoyne S33 is a hole the size of the planet that any Canadian Govt can invoke to drive legislation through that violates our charter rights. acoyne Not the craziest idea in the world. acoyne 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Source: iPoliticsCA - 🏆 36. / 63 Read more »
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »