The 6-3 ruling, with the court’s conservative justices in the majority and liberal justices in dissent, struck down New York state’s limits on carrying concealed handguns outside the home. The court found that the law, enacted in 1913, violated a person’s right to “keep and bear arms” under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.
The New York restriction is unconstitutional because it “prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defence needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms,” Thomas added.Article content The new ruling underscored how the 6-3 conservative majority on the court is sympathetic to an expansive reading of Second Amendment rights.
The ruling said that New York’s concealed firearm regime is at odds with the text and history of the Second Amendment and how gun rights were protected throughout U.S. history. Gun rights, held dear by many Americans and promised by the country’s 18th century founders, are a contentious issue in a nation with high levels of firearms violence including numerous mass shootings. President Joe Biden’s administration backed New York in the case.
Should be more gun sales & bigger problems in Trumptopia.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Lametti may ask Supreme Court to define ‘notwithstanding’ rulesacoyne S33 is a hole the size of the planet that any Canadian Govt can invoke to drive legislation through that violates our charter rights. acoyne Not the craziest idea in the world. acoyne 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Source: iPoliticsCA - 🏆 36. / 63 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: GlobalNational - 🏆 81. / 51 Read more »