The Supreme Court has suspended a Texas law banning online platforms from restricting user posts based on their political views, representing a major win for social media companies.to a petition from tech industry groups that petitioned to block a law they said would violate companies’ First Amendment rights to control what content they disseminate on their websites and platforms.
While the Texas law had gone into effect on May 11 following an appeals court decision, no one has filed lawsuits under the law yet. The Supreme Court block on the law will remain in effect as the case moves through the 5th U.S. Circuit of Court of Appeals.: “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.
“We are encouraged that this attack on First Amendment rights has been halted until a court can fully evaluate the repercussions of Texas’s ill-conceived statute,” said Matthew Schruers, president of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, which filed the petition.The stay is a blow for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has vocally argued that companies like Twitter and Facebook censor conservatives online. Texas governor Greg Abbott signed the law in September.
The Texas law is one of several Republican attempts at the state level to enjoin social media platforms from allegedly censoring conservative viewpoints. Florida also has a similar social media law that has been blocked, and is under review by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the GOP-controlled legislatures of Michigan and Georgia have also advanced similar bills.
NetChoice and CCIA — the tech trade groups that filed the petition — say the Texas law violates their constitutionally protected right to decide what content they put on their platforms. The groups’ members include Facebook, Twitter and Google.While far-right politicians — including former President Donald Trump and Rep. — claim their viewpoints are being unfairly repressed online, many liberals say the companies are not doing enough to remove hate speech and other extremist content.
Active voice: The Supreme Court [...] blocked [...] a Texas law [that] bann[ed] (the law no longer is doing anything...) online platforms from restricting users’ posts based on their political views
StephenGlahn No, the platforms were restricting users' posts based on their content. They're blocking hate speech and disinformation. The fact the vast majority of blocked content is coming from the Right says more about Conservatives than it does about the platforms.
muzzle everybody...including Musk...
An elementary school massacre makes yah think eh?
Spouting crazy, incendiary rhetoric is not a 'political view'. There's politics, and then there's just offensive garbage.
These goofy GOP's Texas lawmakers are not honoring their oaths and following the constitution and serving as elected representatives of the Texas people therefore they must be removed from servicing as representatives of we the people!
They have not undone the do not, not enforce the unblocked ban on unblocking bans of not enforced bans.
Your headline says the opposite of this.
These headlines say two very different things
Need work! I live in Kharkov! The Internet is ready this minute to start!
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: NBCLA - 🏆 319. / 59 Read more »
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
Source: CBS DFW - 🏆 542. / 51 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »