The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked a Texas law that bars large social media companies from banning or censoring users based on “viewpoint,” siding with two technology industry groups that have argued that the Republican-backed measure would turn platforms into “havens of the vilest expression imaginable.”
Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch issued a written dissent, saying that it is “not at all obvious how our existing precedents, which predate the age of the internet, should apply to large social media companies.” Liberal Justice Elena Kagan separately dissented but did not offer any reasons.
In signing the bill last September, Texas Governor Greg Abbott said, “There is a dangerous movement by some social media companies to silence conservative ideas and values. This is wrong and we will not allow it in Texas.” The groups also denounced what they called “viewpoint discrimination against ‘Big Tech,’” in the Texas law through its exclusion of smaller social media platforms popular among conservatives such as Parler, Gab, Gettr and Trump’s own Truth Social.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court backs victims in 34 sex-assault cases in rowGlobe analysis finds sexual-assault cases are on the rise during Me Too era, and defence lawyers have lost 34 consecutive appeals Yet, Fed Liberals just introduced Bill C-5, eliminating mandatory jail sentences for gun crimes? They were put in because Liberal judges were too lenient. How does that keep us safe? We already have the toughest gun laws in the world? Typical Liberal 'Hug-A-thug' soft on crime policies!
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Morning Update: Supreme Court rules against accused in 34 sex-assault cases in rowThe Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that, if the judge who presided over a trial believes a complainant, appeal courts should not disturb a conviction
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Military should give up control of sexual assault cases permanently: former Supreme Court justice | CBC NewsThe time has come for the Canadian Armed Forces to permanently give up control of investigations of sexual offences by its members, says a major new report by a former Supreme Court justice. Can't wait to see which shelf they decide to put it on! Or which other documents they choose to store in front of it to help everyone ignore it! canpoli is so exciting! Reads like a scenario in many police depts in Canada. An organization should never be allowed to investigate itself.
Source: CBCNews - 🏆 2. / 99 Read more »
'It sickens me': Widow of Mountie killed in Moncton shooting angered by Supreme Court decisionThe wife of a Mountie who was shot and killed in Moncton, N.B., nearly 10 years ago says she's frustrated and angry with Canada's highest court. This is wrong. Where is the accountability of the judiciary? We need civilian oversight judges If not to be seen as devaluing the life of the victims, then what should we see it as? This decision would make sense if these criminals were rehabilitated. They're not. Most never will be. Some people should be behind bars for the rest of their lives because they're just going to reoffend.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »
'You want to be on his team': 85-year-old Winnipegger dominating pickleball courtI'd be happy for this group if it weren't for the fact that pickle ball has spread more beer bug infections to those who are vulnerable... I wish they would stop paintings pickleball lines on the tennis courts. It’s distracting and never used. Couldn’t those people just play table tennis or darts inside for their “exercise” !
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »