Supreme Court strikes down parole ineligibility law for mass murders

  • 📰 TorontoStar
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 55%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Friday’s ruling found a section of the Criminal Code on parole eligibility in the case of multiple first-degree murders to be unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously struck down a law that allowed judges to impose consecutive periods of parole ineligibility for people convicted of multiple murders — a decision that means the Toronto van attacker will have to wait no longer than 25 years to be eligible for parole.

“In light of this conclusion, the Chief Justice declared section 745.51 invalid from the time it was enacted in 2011. As a result, the law that existed before that date continues to apply,” according to the “case in brief” posted on the Supreme Court website. In March, Canada’s top court heard arguments about the constitutionality of that provision in the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, who pleaded guilty to murdering six people and attempting to kill six others at the Islamic Cultural Centre in Quebec City in 2017.

The Quebec Court of Appeal ruled in his favour, finding that the 2011 provision constituted cruel and unusual punishment, and reinstated the 25-year parole ineligibility period.The top court’s ruling will have an impact on other cases across the country, including the sentencing of Alek Minassian. He was convicted of murdering 10 people in the Yonge Street van attack in Toronto in 2018. His sentencing hearing is set for June.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Making easier for murders.

Nice.

Having a hard job deciding whats worse the US's gun culture or a judicial system that allows persons to murder as many as they wish for the price of one and will go to the ends of the earth to protect a mass murderer from being extradited Charles Ng /6 yrs 6 courts

Is that why politicians in Canada don't want armed teachers, so the teachers don't give the mass shooter the death penalty? What happens if ISIS members start attacking schools? They will be considered moderates?

Disgusting! These people should never be allowed to see the light of day ever again!

SCC's message to murderers is: 'Kill as many as you want! If you're going to kill 1, why not kill 20? 'Cause we'll only make you pay for 1. The rest are FREEBIES! Enjoy.' A justice system isn't just unless it reflects values of vast majority of society,instead of imposing its own

“Such sentences are degrading in nature and thus incompatible with human dignity because they deny offenders any possibility of reintegration into society,” wrote Chief Justice Richard Wagner.”

Absolute insanity.

Activist Liberal appointed SCC judges more concerned about criminals than the victims. TrudeauLiberalsHaveGotToGo

😡😡😡😡😡😡

What a load of crap.

Wtf is wrong with these people

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 60. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules Quebec City mosque killer to be eligible for parole in 25 yearsThe dead got life without parole. Remember? 🤡 Yes because the civil rights of someone who murdered someone is more important than those of his victim Does it matter? The board will NEVER let this guy out.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Mosque shooter Bissonnette can apply for parole after 25 years, Supreme Court rulesIn its unanimous decision today, the high court declares unconstitutional a 2011 Criminal Code provision that allowed a judge, in the event of multiple…
Source: VancouverSun - 🏆 49. / 61 Read more »

Federal government would join Supreme Court challenge of Quebec’s Bill 21, Justice Minister saysJustice Minister David Lametti says if the challenge to Quebec’s Bill 21 arrives at the country’s top court, it will be ‘a national issue’ Mr. Trudeau said in Saskatoon on Wednesday,“This government will continue to be here to defend people’s fundamental rights and freedoms.” Says the PM who robbed Canadians of their rights and freedoms
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Feds would join challenge of Quebec’s secularism law at Supreme Court | Globalnews.caThe law, commonly known as Bill 21, bans public sector workers who are deemed to be in positions of authority from wearing religious symbols on the job. CAQ separatists in disguise!
Source: GlobalNational - 🏆 81. / 51 Read more »

Federal government would join challenge of Quebec’s Bill 21 at Supreme Court | National NewswatchNational Newswatch: Canada's most comprehensive site for political news and views. Make it a daily habit.
Source: natnewswatch - 🏆 58. / 59 Read more »

Federal government to join Supreme Court challenge of Quebec's Bill 21 secularism lawJustice Minister David Lametti also expresses concern about Bill 96, raising the ire of Premier François Legault. Wasnt Trudeau defending this bill in the last federal election's debates?
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »