Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court that the city discriminated against the activist, Harold Shurtleff, because of his religious viewpoint, even though it had routinely approved applications for the use of one of the three flagpoles outside City Hall that fly the U.S., Massachusetts and Boston flags.Shurtleff and his Camp Constitution wanted to fly a white banner with a red cross on a blue background in the upper left corner, called the Christian flag, to mark Constitution Day, Sept.
But the high court said the lower courts and the city were wrong. The case hinged on whether the flag-flying is an act of the government, in which case Boston can do whatever it wants, or private parties like Shurtleff, Breyer wrote. Breyer wrote that the city's lack of meaningful involvement in the selection of flags or the crafting of their messages leads us to classify the flag raisings as private, not government, speech though nothing prevents Boston from changing its policies going forward.
Seems like the Supreme Court is finally following the constitution doesn’t it?
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules for group in dispute with Boston over flying Christian FlagJUST IN: A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the city of Boston violated the First Amendment when it denied a civic group from flying the Christian Flag from city hall flagpoles to mark Constitution Day. Tell me it’s time to expand the court without saying it’s time to expand the court. Was that the issue of the day, really Separation of church and state. This ruling goes against it.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Boston in Christian flag caseA unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that Boston violated the free speech rights of a conservative activist when it refused his request to fly a Christian flag on a flagpole outside City Hall. Remove the flagpole. There are better venues and symbols for public displays and speech. Is the separation of church and state no longer part of our democracy? With a third flagpole essentially open to anyone, this should not have gone this far. It's that simple.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Boston in Christian flag caseA unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that Boston violated the free speech rights of a conservative activist when it refused his request to fly a Christian flag on a flagpole outside City Hall. WRONG. City halls are the property of all citizens in town, not of particular religious denominations.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »
Supreme Court says Christian flag can fly on Boston’s city propertyA unanimous Supreme Court delivered a win Monday for a Christian group wanting to fly its flag outside Boston’s City Hall, ruling that the city’s policy unfairly discriminated against religious groups’ First Amendment rights.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Says Boston Should Have Allowed Christian Flag on City Property“Boston’s flag-raising program does not express government speech,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the Supreme Court, which reversed a lower court’s judgment.
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Boston in flag disputeDefendant Harold Shurtleff is a former organizer with the John Birch Society and has used his Camp Constitution website to question the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the outcome of the 2…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »