WASHINGTON —
Shurtleff and his Camp Constitution wanted to fly a white banner with a red cross on a blue background in the upper left corner, called the Christian flag, to mark Constitution Day, Sept. 17, in 2017.The city had approved 284 consecutive applications to fly flags, usually those of other nations, before it rejected Shurtleff’s because it was a Christian flag. The city said he could fly a different banner, but Shurtleff refused, and lower courts upheld the city’s decision.
“Finally, we look at the extent to which Boston actively controlled these flag raisings and shaped the messages the flags sent. The answer, it seems, is not at all. And that is the most salient feature of this case,” Breyer wrote in an opinion that also riffed on the brutalist architectural style of Boston’s City Hall and the Siena, Italy-inspired 7-acre plaza on which it sits.
WRONG. City halls are the property of all citizens in town, not of particular religious denominations.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules against Boston in flag disputeDefendant Harold Shurtleff is a former organizer with the John Birch Society and has used his Camp Constitution website to question the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the outcome of the 2…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Boston in Christian flag caseA unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that Boston violated the free speech rights of a conservative activist when it refused his request to fly a Christian flag on a flagpole outside City Hall. Remove the flagpole. There are better venues and symbols for public displays and speech. Is the separation of church and state no longer part of our democracy? With a third flagpole essentially open to anyone, this should not have gone this far. It's that simple.
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court rules for group in dispute with Boston over flying Christian FlagJUST IN: A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the city of Boston violated the First Amendment when it denied a civic group from flying the Christian Flag from city hall flagpoles to mark Constitution Day. Tell me it’s time to expand the court without saying it’s time to expand the court. Was that the issue of the day, really Separation of church and state. This ruling goes against it.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Says Boston Should Have Allowed Christian Flag on City Property“Boston’s flag-raising program does not express government speech,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the Supreme Court, which reversed a lower court’s judgment.
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court says Boston violated First Amendment in Christian flag caseNEW: The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Boston violated the First Amendment when it said a local organization could not fly a Christian flag in front of City Hall. aka Crusader flag Clearly, it's time for followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster to raise their flag and start sculpting again! Christ had a flag? Did it look like this 🇵🇸? Or this 🇮🇱?
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Seems Torn on Whether Biden Can End Trump’s Inhumane Asylum PolicyThe “Remain in Mexico” policy imperils asylum seekers who become victims of predatory violence. Says what we need to know about SCOTUS :( Under the US Constitution and the international law (to which we are part of), court has no choice but to end Trump's inhumane asylum policy. The only inhumane treatment that’s going on is being committed by the DNC Against the American people.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »