Late last week the Constitutional Court issued further directions in the application by former president Jacob Zuma seeking rescission of the court’s order finding him in contempt of court and sentencing him to 15 months’ imprisonment.
Those directions asked the parties to address the question of whether the court is obliged to consider provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in interpreting provisions relating to fair trial, and their implications for Zuma’s detention. This is a little curious: after all, the constitution is explicit in requiring the court to consider international law when interpreting provisions in the Bill of Rights, so it needs no argument in that regard...
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mailandguardian - 🏆 2. / 92 Read more »
Gupta blow as bid to stop NPA attaching assets failsThe Gupta family suffered another court blow when court rules that their lawyers have no authority to oppose a preservation order against one of their companies.
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »
JSC yields to activists to reopen Constitutional Court interviewsOctober shortlist for two vacancies almost the same as during the April process Thats a victory I just wanna say a big thank you to Henrymayson7 I was nobody until a friend of mine introduced me into investing with you, Since then it's been nothing but financial 💰 Success for me. I will invite my friends and family into your company Henrymayson7 you are the best💯🤞
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »
Source: City_Press - 🏆 7. / 72 Read more »
One week on, Zuma remains in hospital for undisclosed conditionZuma was unable to attend court this week, with his medical team telling the judge that doctors were monitoring his progress He's got the Shabir Shaiks. He’s there for the hospital food ZUMA eat your din dins ermbates Erectile dysfunction 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »
Parties agree on appeal against Mkhwebane removal rulingParliament’s rules committee met yesterday to discuss the implications of the High Court judgment that some of the rules on the removal of heads of chapter nine institutions were not constitutional. This headline is misleading. 'Some/most parties agree on appeal...' would have been appropriate. I know for sure that EFF, UDM wouldn't agree with that. The ANC, DA, FF+, EFF, COPE UDM and which parties? They want us to live under apartheid and I will not vote for them. The Public Protector is attacked for her honesty. Let them waste time by the time the judgement is handed down by concourt her term will long be over
Source: IOL - 🏆 46. / 51 Read more »