ConCourt judgment 'judicially emotional and not consistent with our constitution': Zuma Foundation

The foundation said that the “primacy of our constitution” was not upheld in Khampepe's majority judgment.

“At a bare minimum, this means that courts must act independently and without bias, with unremitting fidelity to the law, and must be seen to be doing so. That did not happen in the Constitutional Court, as evidenced by this judgment,” the statement read. “The principle of equality before the law was clearly violated, and the Zondo commission was given an advantage in a case that was adjudicated by DCJ Zondo's colleagues, whom he supervises,” the statement read.

Just because the ruling is against your hero doesn't make it wrong? Take the 'L' team Zums. Do the time.

😂. Turkeys never enjoy Christmas

The best choice I've made this year was investing in cryptocurrency and forex trading and earning from home. With the help of Banjy62 I've been earning ZAR60,353.00k weekly I've never regretted this decision fellow RSA, 🙏🏻

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

ConCourt judgment 'judicially emotional and not consistent with our constitution': Zuma FoundationThe Jacob G Zuma Foundation said the former president believed that the majority judgment, delivered by acting chief justice Sisi Khampepe, showed that the country's courts did not act independently and without bias. There is no greater joy than having financial stability and a life free of debts, that’s why I keep tweeting about Trader_mark1 it has been a pleasure collaborating with you...there is no other way I can show my appreciation other than tweeting the good deed you have done The judge must be a distant cousin, twice removed Respect the court!
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »

ConCourt judgment 'judicially emotional and not consistent with our constitution': Zuma FoundationThe Jacob G Zuma Foundation said the former president believed that the majority judgment, delivered by acting chief justice Sisi Khampepe, showed that the country's courts did not act independently and without bias.
Source: SundayTimesZA - 🏆 47. / 51 Read more »

SA weighs in on Julius Malema welcoming ConCourt Zuma rulingSocial media users have weighed in on EFF leader Julius Malema welcoming the Constitutional Court ruling against former president Jacob Zuma. We just need to respect the highest court in the country that’s it How many times do you wanna publish this? You guys can post all year long it still won’t get the attention yo’ll are seeking for.! timeslives, trying to keep hasbeens alive.🙄
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »

What you said: Readers welcome ConCourt verdict on ZumaTimesLIVE readers have weighed in on the Constitutional Court's judgment against former president Jacob Zuma. Tears grips my heart knowing how hard I’ve struggled to find a legit trader.I never wanted to do this but I’ll be guilty if I don’t share this good news to people sharon_trad is the best trader so far Thanks for helping me and i will forever be grateful to you sharon_trad Ml ease zzz
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »

Busisiwe Mkhwebane aligns herself with minority ConCourt judgment on Jacob ZumaThe Public Protector was asked about the court’s ruling after releasing reports on the outcomes of a number of investigations by her office on Wednesday.
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »