made it difficult for the Supreme Court to schedule oral arguments on the anti-terror law, but should that prevent the en banc from issuing an injunction or a Temporary Restraining Order to stop its implementation?
In 2012, the Supreme Court did not wait for oral arguments before it issued a TRO against the Cybercrime Law. Justices put out the TRO on October 2012, a month after the president signed the law. The High Court would not hold oral arguments on the 15 petitions until January 2013.is a good example because, like the anti-terror law, it was alleged that it infringed on the highly-protected freedom of speech.
If a law restricts speech, an immediate injunction is necessary, the Free Legal Assistance Group said citing two landmark cases of the Supreme Court:that declared as unconstitutional the prior warnings on publishing the Hello Garci tape; andfrom removing Church tarpaulins branding pro-reproductive health candidates as"Team Patay."
"This Honorable Court has repeatedly held that a law that restricts free speech on the basis of content is, in fact, presumed to be unconstitutional, and such presumption warrants the Supreme Court's immediate issuance of a TRO to preserve sacrosanct constitutional rights," FLAG said in a reiterative motion filed October 26., constitutional framers and opposition lawmakers in one of the 37 petitions against the anti-terror law.
That's what retired senior associate justice Antonio Carpio reminded his former colleagues in his own reiterative motion:"Its sole objective is to preserve theBut if the Supreme Court does not issue a TRO, Carpio and
Hawak sa leeg ni Duterte.
The Supreme Court ? they do whatever the Palace tells them to do. They can't even be trusted to vote correctly and sometimes show their personal agendas.
No guts, no glory, honorable justices!
'Political corruption works by having an equally corrupt legal system to protect it.' -Steven Magee
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »