the basis of their request for the SALNs of members of the judiciary, including judges.
"Well, I don’t think it can be reconciled quite honestly," Constitutional Law professor and political analyst Tony La Viña told Rappler in an interview for the Law of Duterte Land Podcast. Sereno allegedly did not file her SALNs, while the Supreme Court is just restricting the release of filed SALNs. Does this conundrum highlight what is obvious in legal and political circles – that while the Supreme Court does not judge a member of the judiciary on the basis of his or her SALN alone, the magistrates used it because it was the only way at the time"It’s hard to say that but from a political point of view, that’s what seems to be the case because there was an impeachment going on. There was going to be a trial...
"These are not graft and corruption investigators, but these are congressmen who already have a predisposition to impeach you because they have already politically decided that they will do that," said La Viña, referring to the Sereno impeachment process. But with the Sereno ouster, the Supreme Court"glorified the SALN, and said if you did not submit the SALN, you must have no integrity," he added.
A big fallacy of judgement
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »
Source: ABSCBNNews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: inquirerdotnet - 🏆 3. / 86 Read more »