Supreme Court blocks curbside voting in Alabama

Oct. 22, 2020, 12:52 AM UTCat polling places that provide that option, ending an option intended to make voting safer and easier during the pandemic.

Three weeks after absentee voting began, a federal judge barred the state from enforcing laws that required voters to submit a copy of a photo ID and to confirm their identity by offering the signatures of two witnesses or a notarized statement. His ruling came in a lawsuit filed by voting rights groups seeking accommodations for people at risk of severe illness from Covid-19 or who had a disability.

Supreme Court Justices Steven Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan said they would have left the judge's order in place. Writing for the three, Sotomayor said curbside voting is a commonsense measure. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals put a hold on the judge's orders pertaining to mail ballots, so the original state requirements for witnesses and photo ID's remain in effect. But the appeals court allowed the ruling on curbside voting to stand.

Heres a producing tip. If your videos have more dislikes than likes and the comments look like this odds are the people think your full of shit. Maybe try the truth next time. We're not stupid anymore. Its over. Its time to let ur old methods go.

Can we say suppression?

Pack the SCOTUS. I’m sick to death of anti-democratic and undemocratic actions by the Judiciary, and by the Senate, who refuse to play by the rules. Dems need to man and woman up, and start fighting as hard as Repubs have for power and influence. We’ve taken it for too long!

Think this ruling is ridiculous? Just wait til sister Amy ascends to the court. There goes our gains as we're returned to the 1900s. I'm putting a downpayment on a mule and wagon.

So why is SCOTUS interfering with states decisions? Shouldn’t they stay out of this issues?

Typical NBC $hit reporting. Do not even mention the majority opinion in the case just the dissent to further their agenda to support the libtards.

Maybe Ginni will get her way and people will stay home.

GOOD....

This Court doesn’t represent American justice! It’s becoming a partisan court job

The world is laughing at us.

Why?

What would possess ANYONE who has anything to say about it make voting more difficult?! I'm at a loss for words...

12 days...DROP YOUR BALLOT IN THE DESIGNATED BALLOT COLLECTION CENTER IN YOUR COUNTY. DON'T WAIT FOR NOV 3RD 2020. ONLY IF CANNOT DRIVE OR GET TO THE PLACE, MAIL IN. BUT WOULD PLEAD TO DROP IT OFF PERSONALLY BETWEEN NOW AND NOV 2ND 2020. SAVE 🇺🇸 AND SAVE DEMOCRACY FOR US.

But, our country will allow California voters to go to the polls maskless? How ass backwards. DoBetter COVIDIOTS

Republicans hate democracy. They absolutely abhor it.

But yet the Supreme Court hasn't met in person since March. Apparently they think its ok for them but not for the disabled.

This is VoterSuppression

Only reason for this is to make voting harder 🤷‍♂️ gop hates democracy 🤷‍♂️

On my mind? The Congressional 'John Lewis Voting Rights Act'! ~BRSchu

Why?

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court clears the way for Alabama to bar curbside votingThe Supreme Court granted a request from the state of Alabama to prohibit voters from casting their ballots curbside Yeah. Why would we want to make it easier to vote? Even more voter suppression The south is so ass backwards its ridiculous
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court Blocks Curbside Voting In Alabama, An Option During PandemicThe high court issued its order Wednesday night, over the dissent of the court's three liberal justices. The practice was intended to accommodate people with disabilities and at-risk individuals. WTF? AlabamaMan To quote the president, 'SAD!'
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

In a 4–4 Split, the Supreme Court Lets Pennsylvania Make Voting Easier—for NowThe decision signals that Amy Coney Barrett will cast the deciding vote in any upcoming election disputes.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court agrees to rule on Trump's immigration policies, but not until next yearThe Supreme Court will rule on Trump's “Remain in Mexico” policy and the legality of his administration's use of military funds to pay for an expanded border wall.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court justices chastise Vermont on the limits of police power in 'deer jacking' caseJustices Gorsuch, Sotomayor and Kagan chastise the highest court in Vermont for ruling that game wardens had a legal right to wander around land of a homeowner suspected of illegally hunting at night.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Editorial: The Supreme Court is taking up two border cases we hope the election makes mootThe Supreme Court will hear cases over President Trump's border wall funding and his requirement that asylum seekers wait in Mexico. A Biden win likely would make these cases moot.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »