5 takeaways from the Amy Coney Barrett hearings

.

In one exchange about ethics, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse informed Barrett that Supreme Court justices have fewer disclosure requirements about stock trades and travel paid for by outside groups, as compared to other federal judges and members to Congress. As she did Tuesday, Barrett spent most of the day Wednesday parrying senators’ questions rather than answering them, but in her second day being grilled she was feistier in her responses to Democrats seeking to put her on the spot.

For a second day, Democrats pressed Barrett — without success — to share her views on a key, 55-year-old precedent critical to the Supreme Court’s privacy jurisprudence and to the legal underpinnings for abortion rights. Democrats said that Barrett’s refusal to discuss the case was at odds with the approach of a string of nominees in recent decades including Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan, as well as Chief Justice John Roberts.

“I couldn’t disagree with you more. I thought she was the most forthcoming of anybody I’ve seen,” Graham said. “I thought she really did explain what makes her tick as a judge. I don’t see how you could get much more out of her — appropriately.”With the Democrats’ nearly relentless focus on the Affordable Care Act, some other critical matters the Supreme Court could take up in the coming years got short shrift.

As she discussed that period, Barrett alluded to the fact that the Supreme Court’s resistance to those moves led a frustrated President Franklin Roosevelt to propose expanding the number of justices. That threat, which critics dubbed “court-packing,” seems to have prompted a retreat by the court in 1937 that cleared the way for federal wage, hour and worker-safety rules.

This is what's called a danger sign if I've ever seen it--no answer to, if a President should commit to a peaceful transfer of power. Do none of you at Politico know anything about Hitler, WWII, or totalitarianism? Anyone? AmyConeyBarrett

Ummm, refuses to comment on whether she had an opinion on the peaceful transfer of power? Looks like Politico's writers flunked history and learned nothing about fascism or even current events. Nothing is more important to our democracy RIGHT NOW. That's a flashing RED LIGHT!.

she is the last mail in the GOP coffin

What I took away was she refused to answer many if not most of the questions and she will be forced down our throats!

That's a lie

She belonged to a CULT. We do NOT want a freaking MOONIE on our highest court! What is so hard to grasp about that?

“In one exchange about ethics, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) informed Barrett that Supreme Court justices have fewer disclosure requirements about stock trades and travel paid for by outside groups, as compared to other federal judges and members to Congress.”

barrettisunqualified

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Live updates: Amy Coney Barrett to face senators on healthcare, abortion rightsAmy Coney Barrett will face senators’ questions over her approach to healthcare and legal precedent, as well as past comments criticizing the landmark abortion ruling Roe vs. Wade during a second day of confirmation hearings. Follow our live blog: good girl Here's everything you need to know about the first day of Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearing
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett to Face Lawmakers’ QuestionsLawmakers Tuesday will get their first chance to ask questions of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s choice to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. good Still struggling with becoming A Profitable Forex trader? I can help you out,Make $3000 in just a week,No need to pay for Signals,Learn how to invest and generate income all by yourself.Become a successful forex trader today📊💰.DM for more info Markharrisfx Watch the Democrats soil themselves and give Trump an even easier win than after the Kavanaugh hearing with their lying witness of Dr Christine B FRAUD. Dr Fraud should be in jail for fabricating the entire story.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court confirmation hearings live updates“Absolutely not,” Amy Coney Barrett tells Sen. Chuck Grassley when asked if she committed to President Trump or anyone else that if confirmed to the Supreme Court, she would vote to repeal the ACA, adding she has not made pre-commitments on any case. Like her or not, that’s actually a great answer. OMG. She really said this? Seriously? Constitutionally that election cannot be changed. She's lying. And lying badly I might add..... ACB making Feinstein look feeble, old, and out of date !!
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

2020 election live updates: Trump attacks Fauci again; Amy Coney Barrett faces questioning at confirmation hearingAt just three weeks until Election Day, the 2020 presidential campaign appears to have reached its final stretch – with one more debate, a Supreme Court confirmation fight and millions of votes to go. Promote your business with my service. and WE will conquer this election AGAIN as well....TRUMP 2020 Jerk has been added. gucci gucci_jp Burberry Burberry_Japan Harassment team using each brand name. The crew is still active. Be careful. Iglooo6 nt11202 tioffoa1iny67ll robano333 hanafudasugar nndamositan famimanobaito catfish_eep rosie_guitar
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »