Opinion | The Supreme Court and the Election Returns

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

From WSJopinion: This year’s election may be chaotic. In resolving legal disputes about vote-counting, the justices should err on the side of speed and clarity, write DavidRivkin and Lee A. Casey

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide as early as Monday whether to grant a stay in Pennsylvania Democratic Party v.

Boockvar, in which the Keystone State’s supreme court, despite state election law to the contrary, ordered officials to count mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day. The justices should do so. This may turn out to be a normal election, in which we know the result by Nov. 4 and the Electoral College meets Dec. 14 to make it official. But a lot could go wrong, and the complex legal issues can be resolved only by the high court.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion DavidRivkin Why would election even reach courts?

opinion DavidRivkin No matter what happens this election is pretty effed.

opinion DavidRivkin David Rivkin on election security?! NURSE!!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Michigan Supreme Court rules against governor again, ending Covid-19 executive ordersThe Michigan Supreme Court on Monday denied Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's request to delay the effect of an opinion that ruled her executive orders on the coronavirus pandemic are unconstitutional. 😡😡 Tik Tok DrSamPage.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

How we got here: The battle over Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court, recappedThough Republicans are speeding the process along, Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation will still take time, and Democrats cite the proximity to the election in arguing the Senate should wait to consider a Supreme Court nominee. Nope. 5 days of Democrat persecution. Then vote. Fill the seat quickly according to the Constitution No need to wait, I say carry on.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Harris: Republicans 'Defying Will Of The People' By Pushing Barrett NominationSen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., called on the Senate to hold off on confirming Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court 'until after Americans decide who they want in the White House.' I know this isn’t related to the conversation but please please help support my baby brother battling leukemia. His condition is getting really critical and we really need to treat him up real fast. I’m on my knees please help support 🙏 This Biden/Harris ticket is such a joke 🤦🏽 That is not how it works, and not what the democrats would do if the roles were reversed.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Nominee Hearings Carry Risks for Both PartiesThe Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, which begin Monday, are expected to renew attention to longstanding fights over abortion rights, health care, gun rights and the government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic Sickening She is the perfect choice to return to the 1950's where, according to Trump and his cult, America was once great. And the American people will be reminded that the GOP and Trump are hellbent on taking healthcare insurance away from them in the middle of a pandemic.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett Pledges To Follow Law, Not Personal Views In Opening StatementThe Supreme Court nominee released prepared remarks on Sunday ahead of her upcoming Senate confirmation hearing,
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »