Commons law clerk challenges government’s redactions of WE Charity docs

  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 68 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 92%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The House of Commons finance committee requested the documents as part of its investigation into Ottawa's since-abandoned plan to outsource the management of a student volunteer program to WE

This translation has been automatically generated and has not been verified for accuracy.In an internal letter, Parliament’s independent law clerk says the thousands of pages of government documents released to MPs on the WE Charity controversy were excessively redacted by government officials.

By choosing to prorogue immediately, rather than just before Parliament’s return, Mr. Trudeau’s decision shut down investigations by several committees into the WE Charity issue. Mr. Dufresne’s letter was first reported by iPolitics. The Globe and Mail has also obtained a copy of the letter, which is not a public document.

In light of the law clerk’s letter, NDP MP and finance critic Peter Julian wrote to the committee clerk asking him to order the release of the documents in line with the committee’s initial request, but that did not happen. The committee’s website notes that all activity ceased with prorogation. It will be up to the membership of the finance committee to decide on its agenda once Parliament resumes.Mr.

“He’s covering up all kinds of key facts that would be material to our investigation and hoping to bury it all under a massive bonanza of tens of billions of dollars of new spending in the fall. I think he also wants to force an early election before any of the these facts become public,” he said in an interview.

“Every effort was made to release as much information as possible to the committee, and indeed cabinet confidences pertaining to the [CSSG] program were disclosed, in keeping with public disclosures made by members of the Queen’s Privy Council,” he said in an e-mail Wednesday.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The question that doesn't appear to have been asked; is who exactly had access to and redacted all these pages if it wasn't civil servants.

“... the various departments responsible for this aborted program did the blackouts themselves — an apparent contravention of the committee's request.” Bureaucrats walk a tightrope as they respond to politicians. Speaking truth to power requires courage and ethical behaviour.

Have liberals done anything legal or non corrupt? I can’t even remember..

This should have been an issue from day 1 of the release. Where has press been on this? Crickets....

A lesson our PM has repeatedly failed to learn, & exactly what I tried to warn Philpott about as my MoH. MPJulian 'It’s the cover-up that is often more scandalous than the scandal and I think the government is getting perilously close to a cover-up on this,” Mr. Julian said.

Unethical govt

Give this law clerk a PROMOTION!!

LiberalCorruption TrudeauResignNOW

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump to nominate acting U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf to permanent postTrump’s announcement comes after the U.S. Government Accountability Office found earlier this month that Wolf’s appointment as acting secretary did not follow processes outlined in federal law The editor is going to fix that name during the revisions process. 'Chad Wolf' has first draft written all over it.
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »

Toronto officer Michael Theriault challenges assault conviction stemming from Dafonte Miller beatingMichael Lacy, who represents Theriault, says they have filed an application to vacate the verdict, arguing the conviction for assault was not available to the court The nerve. Doesn't sound like this violent man is suited to his job. Weeding out the sociopaths is the goal, not protecting them. Asshole knows he’s guilty, Why waste the taxpayers money!
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »