Federal execution renews Supreme Court's divide over death penalty

  • 📰 USATODAY
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court's ideological divide returned Tuesday in a battle over the death penalty, an issue that has haunted the high court for decades.

have replaced the late Associate Justice Antonin Scalia and retired Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy – the ideological alignment remains the same.In the earlier case, the court refused 5-4 to limit states' use of a controversial execution method that dissenters had compared to being burned at the stake.

"While most humans wish to die a painless death, many do not have that good fortune," Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority."Holding that the 8th Amendment demands the elimination of essentially all risk of pain would effectively outlaw the death penalty altogether." Sotomayor wrote the principal dissent at the time, charging that the ruling"leaves petitioners exposed to what may well be the chemical equivalent of being burned at the stake."

Breyer, with Ginsburg, went further. "Rather than try to patch up the death penalty's legal wounds one at a time, I would ask for full briefing on a more basic question: whether the death penalty violates the Constitution," he wrote, citing four reasons – the potential for error, arbitrary application, decades-long delays, and increasing numbers of states and counties abandoning its use.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Libs: Kill babies, not baby killers.

The rest of the world is far more progressive than us

Well, first off, make them public, and the crime rate will go down. Second off, after the public 'sees' an execution, it will be easier to pass a moratorium on execution. Drastic? Yes. This would make the end goal easier to achieve.

You can't be pro-life and pro-death penalty justices!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 100. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Government Carries Out First Federal Execution In 17 Years After Last-Minute Supreme Court DecisionThe Supreme Court has set a precedent for the resumption of the federal death penalty.
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court clears the way for the first federal executions in 17 yearsA divided Supreme Court early Tuesday cleared the way for resumption of federal executions for the first time in 17 years. EXECUTE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS! STOP THE TERRORISTS AND ORGANIZED CRIME! We need more death Bout time they sizzled these criminals
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court clears way for execution of federal prisonerThe Trump administration was moving ahead with the execution of the first federal prison inmate in 17 years after the Supreme Court reversed lower courts and ruled federal executions could proceed. Daniel Lewis Lee was scheduled to be executed in Indiana. But it didn’t happen The victims’ family doesn’t want the execution to go forward. Trump’s M. O.: forcing policies no one wants. Only in Amerika
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Permits First Federal Executions Since 2003A divided Supreme Court cleared the way for the first federal executions since 2003, issuing orders shortly after 2 a.m. that rejected inmate claims that using pentobarbital for lethal injections would be unconstitutional. Maybe they’d prefer the guillotine. Yes, they can still enjoy their favorite final entree as is customary. The Death Penalty is an ideology as is abortion. Under the Constitution you can’t have both an ideological law and a Constitutional law. Either or. So, realDonaldTrump is walking away from his requirements to defend the Constitution. I win. The U.S. is becoming more disgusting every day.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Executes First Federal Inmate Since 2003The Trump administration on Tuesday morning carried out the first federal execution in 17 years, after a divided Supreme Court rejected inmate claims that using pentobarbital for lethal injections would be unconstitutional. Good they should do that more often to criminals The United Kingdom will start implementing a ban on Huawei 5G networks in the country as of late 2020, Culture Secretary O.Dowden. Two-stage ban 1°purchases of Huawei 5G equipment will be banned on December 31, 2°place in 2027 any kit🇬🇧 ⭕20000 € criminal complaint for police🇪🇸 Take one off the count
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Clears Way for First Federal Executions Since 2003The Supreme Court clears the way for the first federal executions since 2003. The Trump administration has scheduled three inmates to be put to death this week. The same 5 member so called conservative majority gave liberals their victory over gay rights But de­nied in­mate claims that use of pen­to­bar­bi­tal for lethal injections would be unconstitutional, over dissents from 4 lib­eral justices. Click to join for discussion of local law enforcement issues and district judges with your neighbors:
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »