In this Sept. 24, 2018, Bill Cosby arrives for his sentencing hearing at the Montgomery County Courthouse, in Norristown, Pa.
The second point is a written agreement from previous Montgomery County prosecutor Bruce Castor not to criminally prosecute Cosby in the Constand case. Castor had testified that while he was district attorney, he promised Cosby he would not file criminal charges if the entertainer would testify in a civil lawsuit Constand filed against Cosby in 2005. Cosby testified during four days of depositions by Constand's attorneys, and the civil lawsuit was settled for more than $3 million in 2006.
NO NO NO NO NO! 👎😖🖤⚖️
Smells like Pell? ❌
Is that Bill Cosby or Jimmy Kimmel?
FFS, can't he just wait for the Trump pardon?
As long as he starts by saying OKAY I'M GUILTY, BUT
Obama judges
JFC. No!
He’s black. They should just let him out. He probably didn’t get a fair shake the first time.
Sex offenders trying to save fellow sex offenders.
Pathetic
This is all about having the money to afford elite attorneys. The rich hardly ever have to pay for their wrong doing. But it cannot feel good being human without a soul.
Pennsylvania has a supreme court? ... and 🤣
take a pill
WTH & why isn't media reporting this?
I did but I didn't One & Two
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Bill Cosby granted appeal in Pennsylvania sex assault caseIn a stunning decision that could test the legal framework of MeToo cases, comedian Bill Cosby has won the right to fight his 2018 sexual assault conviction in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The 82-year-old Cosby has been imprisoned in suburban Philadelphia for nearly two years after a jury convicted Yeah, let's deny that one. AN APPEAL MEANS NOTHING..ITS FILED EVERYTIME.. EVERYONE GETS AN APEAL...I BET HES BEEN BONGING YOUNG INMATES.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Tech Challenge to IRS RulesThe U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to corporate tax regulations, delivering a victory to the Internal Revenue Service that will cost tech companies billions of dollars. OUCH glad i dumped all my tech stocks, they were hella overvalued anyway. This I personally find as a Victory for Main Street
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court won't hear challenge to Trump's steel tariffsThe US Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to President Trump's 25% tariffs on foreign steel Well there ya go ole , buddy awin lol Today would be a good day for SCOTUS to make the orange man release those tax returns That’s a massive roll of tape.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »
Supreme Court gives Trump a win on his steel tariffsThe Supreme Court decided not to hear a case brought by U.S. steel importers against tariffs that Trump imposed in 2018, effectively ending the legal challenge and leaving the steep duties in place on imports from Europe, China and many other countries Trump wins, America loses. Pennsylvania will benefit from SCOTUS decision not to take the case. Good news for PA steel. Thx SCOTUS. This ruling allows domestic producers to raise prices to equal the importers. Therefore, making the importers price equal. This is what was done and we will continue to by the better quality German and Indian steel.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Steel importers await Supreme Court decisionU.S. steel importers are anxiously waiting to find out whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear their case challenging the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s steel tariffs I bet they wouldnt cry if trump put a 20% tax on domestic steel The Supreme Court decided not to hear a case brought by U.S. steel importers against tariffs Trump imposed on steel imports in 2018 Trump used Chinese steel in his buildings.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court’s LGBTQ ruling could have 'broad implications,' legal experts sayThe high court's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, could have implications far beyond employment discrimination. Why doesn’t anyone care about this? Many is that ain't LGBTQ, so called men and women who are supposed to be straight.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »