Supreme Court gives Trump a win on his steel tariffs

The Supreme Court's decision is no surprise, except perhaps to the steel import group's lawyers, said Bill Reinsch, a former Commerce Department official now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"The decision ... is acknowledgment once again that Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it authorized the president to take action to adjust imports that threaten to impair our national security," Thomas Gibson, president of the American Iron and Steel Institute, said in a statement.

However, various efforts in Congress to claw back some of the authority given to the president under the Section 232 have failed to win enough support in either the House or the Senate to become law. Grassley maintains the bill he is working on is meant to help Congress reclaim some of its trade powers from the executive branch, rather than to rein in Trump. He noted, however, that Trump’s use of the law “alerted us to the fact that Congress has been too negligent in the past of protecting our constitutional responsibility.”

Most, if not all, of the countries hit by Trump's duties have retaliated by slapping duties on American exports.

SCOTUS is cool with Trump raising taxes on American corporations.

Good choice

Win for Trump, a loss for American's. This used to cost 800.00 dollars and Now costs $1600.00 dollars... YOU PAY FOR TARRIFS..NOT CHINA

It is odd that while a lot of people would agree that putting an embargo against a country is punitive, and indeed it was and is used this way, a tariff is something that the country benefits. A tariff is an embargo against oneself.

So AMERICAN companies will keep paying those tariffs. Does The Pres still thinking this is contributing to our economy?

This ruling allows domestic producers to raise prices to equal the importers. Therefore, making the importers price equal. This is what was done and we will continue to by the better quality German and Indian steel.

Well done as those actions are the perview of the executive.. Thank god the court is not democratic they would have fined the executive branch with funds going to “ let’s help California “.

Trump wins, America loses.

Pennsylvania will benefit from SCOTUS decision not to take the case. Good news for PA steel. Thx SCOTUS.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Steel importers await Supreme Court decisionU.S. steel importers are anxiously waiting to find out whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear their case challenging the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s steel tariffs I bet they wouldnt cry if trump put a 20% tax on domestic steel The Supreme Court decided not to hear a case brought by U.S. steel importers against tariffs Trump imposed on steel imports in 2018 Trump used Chinese steel in his buildings.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court won't hear challenge to Trump's steel tariffsThe US Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to President Trump's 25% tariffs on foreign steel Well there ya go ole , buddy awin lol Today would be a good day for SCOTUS to make the orange man release those tax returns That’s a massive roll of tape.
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Trump's steel tariffsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs on imported steel brought by an industry group that had argued that a key part of the law under which he imposed the duties violates the U.S. Constitution. American's are paying for the tariffs. Just thought you need to know it..
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Abortion case could end — or add to — streak of liberal wins at Supreme CourtThe left won Supreme Court cases on LGBT rights and DACA this week despite a conservative majority, but an upcoming abortion case has liberals holding their breath. What braintrust figured this out? Did John Madden write that headline? Eugene_Scott Oh word is it going to go one way or the other? Groundbreaking
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court set to rule on landmark abortion case that could limit women's accessWhen Louisiana native Kim O'Brien decided to have an abortion in 2011 because her pregnancy had severe complications, she was unaware of the difficulties she would face -- including traveling to another state -- to get the care she is legally entitled to through Roe v. Wade. Now, nine years later
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

What Happened After Nixon Failed to Appoint a Woman to the Supreme CourtHow Richard Nixon tried to soothe his wife after he failed to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court Tourism season is fast approaching. Book your weekend stay now. Border crossing times are low. Bring the family! visitChop Pat pat pat pat pat
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »