Justices reject end to protections for young immigrants

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 33 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court rejects Trump bid to end legal protections for young immigrants.

The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, early Monday, June 15, 2020.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President Donald Trump’s effort to end legal protections for 650,000 young immigrants, a stunning rebuke to the president in the midst of his reelection campaign. The outcome seems certain to elevate the issue in Trump’s campaign, given the anti-immigrant rhetoric of his first presidential run in 2016 and immigration restrictions his administration has imposed since then.

The justices rejected administration arguments that the 8-year-old Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program is illegal and that courts have no role to play in reviewing the decision to end DACA.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Morning_Joe The media lying again, this was not a rejection of the principle only the proper legal form it was filed.

That was short lived..... Donald J. Trump The Supreme Court asked us to resubmit on DACA, nothing was lost or won. They “punted”, much like in a football game (where hopefully they would stand for our great American Flag). We will be submitting enhanced papers shortly

. That is why you are called fake news. What it says is that the way this administration implemented ending it was incorrect. They are now going to spend more tax dollars reframing the executive order and President Trump will sign it. Will probably go to the supreme court again.

Go Dreamers!!!!

Morning_Joe You left out the word 'Illegal'

shaboom Excellent headline, .!

Trump will blame the economic downturn on the democrats and immigrants and totally not the virus as elections get closer.

If a law goes against the Constitution then it is not legal.

I just about had it with them liberal Supreme Court justices legislating from the bench first with gay rights and now with them Mexicans. We are losing are country this isnt the country I grew up in feels like a banana republic sometimes I feel like I am in Caracas Valenzuela.

I don’t know why the legislature can’t do their job and pass a law. That would have prevented this whole mess!

GRAN TRIUNFO PARA LOS DREAMERS. RT

Where exactly does he want to send those children to? Trump is evil!

Supreme Court be like where else am I gonna find cheap laborers to clean my toilets?

'We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,“ Roberts wrote. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action.' The Department of Homeland Security can try again, he wrote.

These non-black immigrants unfortunately practice anti-black racism so this is no win for Black Americans. NoAntiBlackRacism

Illegal

They’re not immigrants, they’re illegals

On a scale of 1 to 10, how mad are social conservatives now with John Roberts? I’m guessing 13.

You mean the illegal aliens that are here brought to this country by their illegal alien parents? 🙄

Give them citizenship then fix the broken system. Since there are a lot of talk of slavery lately, let’s end the 14th amendment. After all it was written to make sure blacks would become citizens after being freed. Stop illegal immigration by birth right.

Sometimes Satan wins... Even the SCOTUS Justices who made this action know this legislating from the bench is not constitutional or legal... and obviously an executive order from one President can be countermanded by another. This is planned election tampering. ABC CBSNews CNN

You're headline is wrong. It's 'illegal' immigrants.

It's only a policy any president can dissolve it.

realDonaldTrump that’s a lot of losses lately. Seems like you’re not always winning after all.

(1) comment is about the journalism, not the issue itself. (2) “We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,“ Roberts wrote. “We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action.

That’s what I’m talking about.. 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

I love it HAHAHAHA

Trump fails again.

Trump is the weakest president this country has ever seen and he’s made China the strongest it’s ever been.

It’s OK to DREAM again in the United States.

DACA is the result of the DREAM Act, a bipartisan bill proposed in 2001 in the Bush administration. Those young people deserve to become American citizens.

✊❤✊❤

Tired. Of. So. Much. Win. Ning. 🤡

Trump is going too far

Good news 👏👏📰

The justices in a 5-4 decision rejected arguments that the 8-year-old Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program, which provides legal protections for 650,000 young immigrants, is illegal.

Morning_Joe Amazing! Now, let us really work on immigration reform in a bipartisan way and truly fix a clearly broken system

Morning_Joe rewrite! DACA - DACA - DACA - DACA!! realDonaldTrump loses again Trump take that with you on your EXIT train You THOUGHT those guys you put in the chair Will make a difference, but now LQQK-A-HERE! John Roberts know the TRUTH is the LAW Your attempt was cut by a chainsaw!!!

China's political circles are always protected by officials. Driven by power and money, the balance of law will tilt. My father and uncle were killed by the government officials' drink driving. They haven't been solved for more than 70 days. My heart is very painful.

Now they need a path to citizenship.

Yeeeaaaaah

White people who stole land from Native Americans and killed them off are complaining about brown people who also stole and killed off Native Americans are coming into their country 🙄🙄

You misspelled 'illegal aliens,' again, . I'm sure it was just another honest mistake. On the bright side, I assume a 97% consensus of 'young' MS-13 domestic terrorists who were allowed to rush right in, amid Obama's illegal DACA EO, are applauding you right now.

*illegal immigrants

Lol, oops.

Aye! Now lets release those taxes.

Morning_Joe Is this what winning looks like realDonaldTrump ?

The trumpkins turned blind eyes to the porn stars, the playboy models, the constant idiocy, the record deficits, .... All because of the Supreme Court How’s that working out?

Good. This was the right call by the Supreme Court.

Young illegal immigrants. Young immigrants are always welcome

Trump is so bad at this lol

He’s having a bad week

'What will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul?' - Mathew 16:26 Save U.S. from ourselves, don't vote for Trump! Trump ain't got religion.

realDonaldTrump EAT IT!

He broke the law.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

GOP senator unveils bill to rein in liability protections of Facebook, Google and moreThe bill appears to be part of a three-pronged attack on Section 230 protections for tech companies alongside the Department of Justice and the White House. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Harsh shot fired on Facebook....
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Justice Department Proposes Rolling Back Legal Protections For Online PlatformsThe Justice Department's proposed legislation follows a May executive order by President Trump to limit protections for social media after Twitter began adding fact checks to some of his tweets. Excellent Yes.. But Facebook Billionaire Boy likes Trumpy.. Remember...
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

WSJ News Exclusive | Justice Department to Propose Limiting Internet Firms’ ProtectionsThe Justice Department is set to propose a roll back of legal protections that online platforms have enjoyed for more than two decades, in an effort to make tech companies more responsible in how they police their content, according to a Trump administration official. You mean TOOK ADVANTAGE OF... There, I fixed ANOTHER headline for you. Fools. One mans agony, millions sufferings
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Justice Department Proposal Targets Legal Protections For Online PlatformsA Trump official has said that the DOJ will propose limiting Section 230 legal protections for online platforms like Facebook and Twitter. 👋 Naxxion Great news. Let's hope the Trump administration actually deliver and make good on this.
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Gorsuch's Supreme Court opinion for LGBTQ rights sends a shudder through conservative ranksJustice Neil Gorsuch was President Trump’s first choice for the Supreme Court and a conservative’s dream — until he wrote this week’s landmark opinion extending civil rights protections to LGBTQ employees nationwide. The ruling sent a shudder through the ranks of conservative activists and columnists, some of whom saw signs of another betrayal by a Republican-appointed justice who ended up siding at times with liberals on key issues. Many liberals in America will view the SCOTUS ruling on transgender rights as a reaffirmation of America & that some institutions still work. This is in fact the start of America’s unraveling. The ruling will be seen as a betrayal & Alito’s dissent a call to arms. Literally. He doesn’t own the courts .. though may like to think so !! Maybe just Brett K
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »