U.S. Supreme Court clears way for pipeline to cross Appalachian Trail

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 97%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Ruling against environmentalists, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday decided that the federal government has the authority to allow a proposed $7.5 billion natural gas pipeline to cross under the popular Appalachian Trail in rural Virginia.

FILE PHOTO: Runners exercise on the empty front steps of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S. May 8, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

“Today’s decision is an affirmation for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and communities across our region that are depending on it for jobs, economic growth and clean energy. We look forward to resolving the remaining project permits,” Dominion said in a statement. The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found in 2018 that the Forest Service lacked the authority to grant a right of way for the pipeline where it crosses the Appalachian Trail in the national forest land because the trail was overseen by the National Park Service.

Kelly Martin, who heads the Sierra Club’s Beyond Dirty Fuels Campaign, vowed to contest the remaining permit applications.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Disgusting

noooooooooooooooooo!

American terrorists....

I'm going to watch Fern Gully and sob in bed with a carton of ice cream and possibly tie myself to a pipeline bulldozer. AppalachianTrail

lawrencehurley Trump’s money-first-and-money-only philosophy will soon be SCOTUS-approved to put pipelines through every place of beauty and wonder we have. Even though solar, wind and other energy sources increasingly reduce demand for carbon fuels. Can you say WEALTHY DONOR DEMANDS?

Boo.

Wow kids what a beuitiful sycamore tree, a mountain lion, and oh look at this my my what a beautiful oil pipe, so glad they painted it white to blend in, look here a minor leak what a pretty oily rainbow. Good grief the AT will be ruined!

Anyone else tired of the constant battle to fight major corporations from destroying our precious environment and battling our own government for equal rights for all people or is it just me? Sheisweary

Criminal!

UGH

Disgrace

I suppose that was the 'pay off' for human rights decision. I hope oil prices make it unviable. AppalachianTrailPipeline

They sure did a lot of bad things under the umbrella of one good thing today.

🤦‍♀️

That’s not going to end well 🤦‍♀️

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules gay workers protected from job discrimination, in big win for LGBT rightsThe Supreme Court handed a big win to the LGBT community Monday, ruling in a 6-3 decision that an employer who fires a worker for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act -- which already protected people from employer sex discrimination, as well as discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin. When I find my employees BUTT fucking in the employee lounge. Their asses are FIRED. Take me to court!! Meanwhile in Brazil ... The Supreme Court ordered the release of pedophiles, rapists, drug traffickers because of COVID-19 and, today, it ordered the arrest of a Brazilian Youtuber who was protesting the court ... Brazil under the dictatorship of the supreme court ... could these sorts of rights now also be granted to conservatives who post on social media websites?
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court rules existing civil rights law protects gay and lesbian workersThe decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation. Justice for all. What a waste of time and money. This is what has been said all along, EXISTING LAW, already protects you! ah well I am sure the lawyers made out like bandits on all that activist money. Change is in the air people!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court turns aside Justice Department, won't hear California sanctuary cities caseJUST IN: US Supreme Court says it will not take up a legal battle over whether local governments can declare themselves sanctuaries and refuse to help federal agents enforce immigration laws. 1 oops what good are they then?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court decides not to hear big gun rights cases, dealing blow to Second Amendment activistsThe Supreme Court said it would not hear appeals of a slew of cases involving gun laws, dealing a loss to Second Amendment activists who want to expand the rights of gun owners. Shoot them all👹👹👹 Bummer “Second Amendment activists” is a very sympathetic way to say “gun nuts”
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court endorses gay, transgender worker protectionsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday delivered a watershed victory for LGBT rights, ruling that a landmark federal law forbidding workplace discrimination protects gay and transgender employees. The 6-3 ruling represented the biggest moment for LGBT rights in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized Congress has been asked repeatedly in the years since 1964 to address this question,' he said. 'Congress has declined or failed to act on these requests. They won’t act on immigration reform either. What good are they?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »