Leah Millis/Reuterson Tuesday wrestled with the legality of sweeping congressional subpoenas for President Trump’s personal financial records, raising concerns about potential for"presidential harassment" as Congress asserts power to obtain the information for help drafting ethics and anti-corruption laws.
The court also debated a New York grand jury subpoena for similar records sought by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance. Justice Stephen Breyer noted the subpoenas were seeking"a lot of information and some of it's pretty vague," adding that"there may be burdens" imposed on the president by forcing his banks and accounting firm to produce them.
if this were related to Obama,it would be a 9-0 or 8-1 decision
Key word SEEMED.
Immunity from prosecution and immunity from investigation are NOT the same thing. Waiting and hoping.....
How divided? 5-4? 6-3? 4-4-1?
How can it be divided?
We are still waiting for Obama’s Birth certificate.
Y’all mind ya own business
'I'm the most transparent president ever, I'll show my tax returns very soon, very very soon' 'I have nothing to hide'
Divided? Sure it is. Another victory for Trump.
It’s not harassment, it’s your job. Release his taxes. Allow Americans to see who Trump really is. The Lying Crook!
Chief Justice John Roberts worried the House committees are claiming a 'limitless' ability to request private documents of a sitting president, while Justice Stephen Breyer noted the subpoenas sought 'a lot of information and some of it's pretty vague.'
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court hears arguments over whether Trump can keep tax records shielded from CongressAttorneys for President Donald Trump faced questions from the justices of the Supreme Court on Tuesday over whether allowing Trump to keep his tax records shielded from House Democrats would unconstitutionally limit the power of Congress to conduct investigations. Tough questions but still guessing Trump's Supreme Court will give him a pass. Putting on a good show, though. Nope. Anyone who runs, or serves, in public office should have to open their books to the PUBLIC! They work for us, they are paid by us, and they are elected by us! releasetrumptaxes And Sekelow is making it hard for anyone to think that there’s nothing incriminating in them.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »