Fired Zuma lawyer fires broadside at judge

  • 📰 BDliveSA
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Daniel Mantsha says high court findings against his former client were highly political and biased

Daniel Mantsha, who was recently fired as former President Jacob Zuma’s lawyer, has hit out at KwaZulu-Natal judge Dhaya Pillay, saying her judgment against his client was biased and “highly political in its one-sided narration”.

Mantsha was fired by Zuma after he filed a bizarre 115-page affidavit on behalf of the former president at the Constitutional Court, as part of Zuma’s now-abandoned campaign to permanently stop his corruption trial from proceeding.A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as exclusive Financial Times articles, ProfileData financial data, and digital access to the Sunday Times and Times Select.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

There was nothing sinister in tobacco ban decision, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma saysU-turn was the result of consultations, co-operative governance minister says in court papers Well thank you for clarifying that for us all... Much appreciated Whatever! YES THERE WAS!!! DlaminiZuma by not releasing information of public interest to the public, in a democracy, that would be considered “sinister”. When can we see your meeting minutes to know the truth and actually educate ourselves rather than eat your drivel?
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »

‘Zuma and son trying to gain sympathy as corruption trial looms’The YouTube channel launched by Jacob Zuma and his son Duduzane has been described as a “mere smokescreen and public relations diversion meant to gain public sympathy given the looming arms deal corruption trial to be faced by the former president in June” Described by whom? As for me, I know and I cannot be made to think otherwise about Msholozi, I was old enough to see all the shenanigans under his Administration, with the support of his party ofcource Who needs public sympathy in court? You people talk shit.
Source: City_Press - 🏆 7. / 72 Read more »