Federal court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy -- then reverses itself

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 109 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 47%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The “Remain in Mexico” policy took effect in January 2019 in San Diego. Nearly 60,000 people have been sent back since the policy began.

TUCSON, Ariz. – A federal appeals court has blocked the Trump administration’s policy of returning asylum-seekers to Mexico to await court hearings, a practice immigrant advocates have denounced as inhumane and deadly.

Since the U.S. Department of Homeland Security rolled out the program in January 2019, the U.S. government has sent back more than 60,000 people to seven Mexican border cities from Tijuana to Matamoros. Those included some of those most dangerous areas of the border, exposing migrants to assaults, kidnappings, murders and extortion.Watch: Thousands chant against immigration policy across USA

“There should be immediate relief for those currently in the MPP program,” Steglich said. “Right now, it’s unclear what will happen.” In an 81-page opinion published on Friday morning, a three-judge panel with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California found that the program"is inconsistent" with U.S. federal law and should be blocked entirely. Judges split 2-1 on the decision.

Judges William Fletcher and Richard Paez, who were both appointed by President Bill Clinton, voted to block MPP. Judge Ferdinand Fernandez, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, dissented. He confirmed they're working with the Justice Department to"expeditiously" appeal the court's"inexplicable" decision.

Judy Rabinovitz, an attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, argued the case before the judges. Regardless of which route it takes, Tan said, the Justice Department could once again ask the courts to stay Friday's decision, pending an appeal. Al Otro Lado, a binational legal aid group based in California that has provided assistance to asylum-seekers returned under MPP to Tijuana and Mexicali, claimed victory following the court’s decision.

The labor union for federal asylum officers, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1924, condemned the policy in an amicus briefing filed in June to go along with the lawsuit. “MPP abandons our tradition of providing a safe haven to the persecuted and violates our international and domestic legal obligations,” the union wrote.

Across the border, José Ascención Moreno Mena expressed his satisfaction with the court's ruling given the"unnecessary risks" the policy exposed returned migrants to.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

in Nuevo Laredo after —-the government —— abolished the 'wet foot/dry foot' rule, which eased the way for Cubans reaching U.S. soil to stay in the U.S. By Government you mean Obama!! And y’all still want to know why us simple folk hate the media!

wtf

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Federal court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyThe “Remain in Mexico” policy took effect in January 2019 in San Diego. Nearly 60,000 people have been sent back since the policy began. Thank you Mr President. Keep up the good work It’s about TIME!! We need to send TRUMP to Mexico... Problem is: MEXICO WOULDN’T LET TRUMP INTO MEXICO!!! Good!! They shouldn’t be allowed to stay here in the States.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Federal Court Again Blocks Trump's 'Remain In Mexico' ProgramA federal appeals court in California has blocked the Trump administration's 'Remain in Mexico' program — a blow to the president's controversial policy requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their day in U.S. immigration court. To the the supreme court it goes............again and again and again. BeneathUs Bravo
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyA federal appeals court has temporarily halted a major Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts. HA! Mmarty1230 This says it all: '...two judges in the majority, both appointed by Democrats...' Could they be ANY more transparent? And what happens next? Supreme Court who have already ruled in this law's favor. Mmarty1230 Is this so they can then fake outrage that illnesses/viruses are getting into our Country 🙄. The 9th circuit needs disbanded.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyA federal appeals court on Friday temporarily halted a Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts. The same court decided to keep another major change on hold, one that denies asylum to anyone who enters the U.S. illegally Another democrat-controlled Court makes another asinine decision which will be eventually overturned Time to appeal
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyAn federal appeals court has temporarily halted a major Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts Citizens need to send a clear message to the invaders. They should be racing to the borders in fear. That wont hold up. Gaming the system is over All illegals should be on the fast track for deportation.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »