TUCSON, Ariz. – A federal appeals court has blocked the Trump administration’s policy of returning asylum-seekers to Mexico to await court hearings, a practice immigrant advocates have denounced as inhumane and deadly.
Since the U.S. Department of Homeland Security rolled out the program in January 2019, the U.S. government has sent back more than 60,000 people to seven Mexican border cities from Tijuana to Matamoros. Those included some of those most dangerous areas of the border, exposing migrants to assaults, kidnappings, murders and extortion.Watch: Thousands chant against immigration policy across USA
“There should be immediate relief for those currently in the MPP program,” Steglich said. “Right now, it’s unclear what will happen.” In an 81-page opinion published on Friday morning, a three-judge panel with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California found that the program"is inconsistent" with U.S. federal law and should be blocked entirely. Judges split 2-1 on the decision.
Judges William Fletcher and Richard Paez, who were both appointed by President Bill Clinton, voted to block MPP. Judge Ferdinand Fernandez, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, dissented. He confirmed they're working with the Justice Department to"expeditiously" appeal the court's"inexplicable" decision.
Judy Rabinovitz, an attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, argued the case before the judges. Regardless of which route it takes, Tan said, the Justice Department could once again ask the courts to stay Friday's decision, pending an appeal. Al Otro Lado, a binational legal aid group based in California that has provided assistance to asylum-seekers returned under MPP to Tijuana and Mexicali, claimed victory following the court’s decision.
The labor union for federal asylum officers, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1924, condemned the policy in an amicus briefing filed in June to go along with the lawsuit. “MPP abandons our tradition of providing a safe haven to the persecuted and violates our international and domestic legal obligations,” the union wrote.
Across the border, José Ascención Moreno Mena expressed his satisfaction with the court's ruling given the"unnecessary risks" the policy exposed returned migrants to.
in Nuevo Laredo after —-the government —— abolished the 'wet foot/dry foot' rule, which eased the way for Cubans reaching U.S. soil to stay in the U.S. By Government you mean Obama!! And y’all still want to know why us simple folk hate the media!
wtf
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »