U.S. authorities have argued that the policy keeps migrants from slipping into the U.S. and deters other migrants considering crossing from the U.S. southern border.
A federal district court in California had issued a ruling blocking the policy during the case, but MPP continued while the U.S. government appealed. The U.S. government rolled out the Migrant Protection Protocols in San Diego-Tijuana in January 2019. It later began sending asylum-seekers to Mexico in Calexico-Mexicali at the California border; El Paso-Ciudad Juárez, Brownsville-Matamoros, Laredo-Nuevo Laredo and Eagle Pass-Piedras Negras along the Texas border; and Nogales-Nogales, Sonora, at the Arizona border.
The American Civil Liberties Union litigated the appeal before the 9th Circuit in October, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center and Center for Gender and Refugee Studies.
Good!! They shouldn’t be allowed to stay here in the States.
It’s about TIME!! We need to send TRUMP to Mexico... Problem is: MEXICO WOULDN’T LET TRUMP INTO MEXICO!!!
Thank you Mr President. Keep up the good work
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Court Again Blocks Trump's 'Remain In Mexico' ProgramA federal appeals court in California has blocked the Trump administration's 'Remain in Mexico' program — a blow to the president's controversial policy requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their day in U.S. immigration court. To the the supreme court it goes............again and again and again. BeneathUs Bravo
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyA federal appeals court has temporarily halted a major Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts. HA! Mmarty1230 This says it all: '...two judges in the majority, both appointed by Democrats...' Could they be ANY more transparent? And what happens next? Supreme Court who have already ruled in this law's favor. Mmarty1230 Is this so they can then fake outrage that illnesses/viruses are getting into our Country 🙄. The 9th circuit needs disbanded.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyA federal appeals court on Friday temporarily halted a Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts. The same court decided to keep another major change on hold, one that denies asylum to anyone who enters the U.S. illegally Another democrat-controlled Court makes another asinine decision which will be eventually overturned Time to appeal
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Court temporarily halts Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policyAn federal appeals court has temporarily halted a major Trump administration policy to make asylum seekers wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. immigration courts Citizens need to send a clear message to the invaders. They should be racing to the borders in fear. That wont hold up. Gaming the system is over All illegals should be on the fast track for deportation.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Appeals Court Blocks Trump's Remain-In-Mexico Asylum PolicyA federal appeals court ruled the Trump administration must halt a policy of returning Central American migrants to Mexico while their requests for asylum in the U.S. are considered. So wrong! ❤️
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »