San Antonio’s public camping ban untouched by Supreme Court ruling

  • 📰 SAReport
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 68 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with the City of Grants Pass, Oregon, upholding local ordinances that criminalize sleeping in public.

The City of San Antonio and the SAPD perform a homeless encampment abatement along the I-37 corridor on the near East Side in 2022.the City of Grants Pass, Oregon on Friday, upholding local ordinances across the country — including San Antonio’s — that criminalize sleeping in public and homeless encampments., a newsletter rundown of the most important news, delivered every Monday and Thursday.

“The Constitution’s Eighth Amendment serves many important functions,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion, “but it does not authorize federal judges to wrest those rights and responsibilities from the American people and in their place dictate this Nation’s homelessness policy.”The majority decision “leaves the most vulnerable in our society with an impossible choice: Either stay awake or be arrested,” Sotomayor wrote for the minority opinion.

“We are concerned and will closely monitor the impact of today’s ruling on communities nationwide,” said Katie Wilson, executive director of Close to Home, which coordinates the local homeless response system. “Criminalizing people for their lack of safe shelter or housing will never be the answer to addressing homelessness. It is important that communities across the country, including ours, do not change course based on this ruling.

“Close to Home, and our Alliance , will continue to focus on compassionate, sustainable solutions to address homelessness. We need to continue working on permanent housing options, preventing homelessness, and sustaining our homelessness response system.”Camping in public without a permit has been banned in San Antonio since 2005. People can be charged with a class C misdemeanor and fined up to $500 for violations.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 252. in ERROR

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

San Francisco’s dishonest legal brief helped U.S. Supreme Court criminalize homelessnessThe city's dishonest amicus brief provided succor to the Trump Supreme Court and will now enable a nationwide homeless crackdown.
Source: SFnewsnow - 🏆 237. / 63 Read more »

San Diego leaders weigh in on Supreme Court's homelessness rulingCity News Service is one of the largest regional news services in the country, serving the Southern California region.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »

San Francisco leaders react to Supreme Court ruling on homelessnessThe San Francisco City Attorney's Office on Friday agreed that the Supreme Court's decision on the contentious Grants Pass v Johnson case has 'significant implications' for the city.
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court: Cities can enforce bans on homeless people sleeping, reversing San Francisco rulingThe Supreme Court decided on Friday that cities can enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outdoors in West Coast areas where shelter space is lacking.
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court rules in government’s favor in San Diego ‘blind mule’ drug courier caseIn 6-3 opinion that could have wider implications in criminal cases, the Supreme Court ruled expert witnesses can testify that most drug couriers caught at Mexican border know they’re transpo…
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court rules in favor of San Antonio-area woman suing Castle Hills for retaliationA woman who sued the City of Castle Hills for alleged political retaliation has scored a victory in the U.S. Supreme Court. On Thursday, justices ruled that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had previously swatted down the suit, misinterpreted case law.
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »