San Francisco’s dishonest legal brief helped U.S. Supreme Court criminalize homelessness

enabling municipalities to roust, fine or even incarcerate homeless people without offering them anywhere to go, might as well suffice.Trump appointee Justice Neil Gorsuch’s decision leans rather heavily on an amicus brief submitted by San Francisco. The San Francisco officials who submitted that amicus brief buttressing Gorsuch’s opinion will have to come to terms with what they have done. So will others.

Following today’s ruling, there’s a lot less legal standing to hold San Francisco to its “compassionate” and “service-first” policies. And less “liberal” municipalities, which don’t even deign to claim such policies, let alonethem, can essentially crack the whip and drive their homeless populations to places that do. Like here.

It was transcendently stupid to claim that a December 2022 injunction led to this city becoming overrun with vagrants and tents. San Francisco has had a homeless problem. In 2020, years before that injunction, things got so bad in the heart of the city that San Francisco was forced toremoval of tents from the streets following that injunction only reveals just how transcendently stupid that moment was. And dishonest. Don’t forget the dishonesty.

Gorsuch — and, by extension, Breed — would have you believe that San Francisco is powerless to prevent every man, woman and child from asphyxiating in a swamp of needles and feces. But, again, it ain’t necessarily so: Yes, the 2022 injunction specifically did not allow cops tostreet dwellers with four sections of the penal code and two sections of the police code regarding, among other matters, public lodging or sitting on the sidewalk.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

San Diego leaders weigh in on Supreme Court's homelessness rulingCity News Service is one of the largest regional news services in the country, serving the Southern California region.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »

San Francisco leaders react to Supreme Court ruling on homelessnessThe San Francisco City Attorney's Office on Friday agreed that the Supreme Court's decision on the contentious Grants Pass v Johnson case has 'significant implications' for the city.
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court: Cities can enforce bans on homeless people sleeping, reversing San Francisco rulingThe Supreme Court decided on Friday that cities can enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outdoors in West Coast areas where shelter space is lacking.
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court rules in government’s favor in San Diego ‘blind mule’ drug courier caseIn 6-3 opinion that could have wider implications in criminal cases, the Supreme Court ruled expert witnesses can testify that most drug couriers caught at Mexican border know they’re transpo…
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Supreme Court rules in favor of San Antonio-area woman suing Castle Hills for retaliationA woman who sued the City of Castle Hills for alleged political retaliation has scored a victory in the U.S. Supreme Court. On Thursday, justices ruled that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which had previously swatted down the suit, misinterpreted case law.
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »

Iowa’s Supreme Court tells lower court to let strict abortion law go into effectThe 4-3 ruling is a win for Republican lawmakers.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »