But Brad Moss, a partner for Mark S. Zaid, P.C., the law firm representing the whistleblower—whose
Well, there’s not a lot the person can do from a legal standpoint. But they're going to have to leave where they're living at the time. Probably they're going to have to get a safe house somewhere, to live temporarily. And they're going to have to probably engage in some kind of service for physical security. It's a scary proposition for the whistleblower and for the lawyers.
If it was up to me, the public and the press would not know about it, ever, in terms of when [the testimony] happened. If only because to reveal when it happened gives individuals, even with good and noble intentions, the ability to start tracking down where different players in the government were at that time, and try to track down who this person could have been. If the person is going to testify, which is not required, it is an option. They are not obligated to do so.
Yeah. And part of it's political. People are harping on the idea of the person being an intelligence officer. And so everybody starts thinking James Bond. You start thinking Jason Bourne, and you start thinking images you've seen from TV, from Hollywood, of what people are like in the intelligence community. The majority of people are nothing like that, especially intelligence officers.
Poor Whistle Blower. Must feel like the guy in County Jail with an irate torch-carrying mob outside. 😳. GET THIS: He is NOT an ACCUSER. He is a REPORTER. Everything he says must be corroborated, verified or it dies.
The individual is making claims against a president that millions voted for, then wants to lives normal life? Delusional.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »