President faces additional court challenge by legal eagle over revoked appointment
In it, he opposes Ramaphosa’s application for condonation for his late filing of an answering affidavit.Ramaphosa’s mistake was to “pick and choose” which matters he will deal with first.Mncwabe said Ramaphosa’s mistake was to “pick and choose” which matters he will deal with first. “I verily confirm and place it on record that the three above mentioned applications were initiated from May 2019, well after this review application by myself was initiated in April 2019, yet these three applications have since received first preference … while this application of mine has been relegated as a matter of secondary importance”.
The other revoked appointments that were being challenged were those of the director of public prosecutions for Mpumalanga, Advocate Raymond Mathenjwa, and the special director of public prosecutions for the priority crimes litigation unit, Advocate Jacobus Pretorius. Mncwabe said the constitutional provisions which Ramaphosa claimed to have used to revoke his appointment could not be delegated to Lubisi.
He was able to file papers to seal the CR17BankStatements after the CR17leaks it was a delaying tactic on his part which was calculated