WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared divided over the legality of Kansas prosecuting three immigrants for violating identity theft laws by using other people’s Social Security numbers in a dispute over whether the state impermissibly encroached on federal control over immigration policy.
The case tests how state criminal laws can be used against illegal immigrants and other people who do not have work authorization in the United States. President Donald Trump’s administration backed Kansas in the case. Trump has made his hardline policies toward immigration a centerpiece of his presidency and 2020 re-election campaign.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito suggested the state’s actions did not undermine federal law. “What is the conflict? The federal government doesn’t say this is contrary to our enforcement priorities,” Alito said. A Social Security number is primarily used to identify people for employment and tax purposes. People who enter the country illegally do not get assigned Social Security numbers, which are given by the U.S. government to all legal residents.
The Feds don't want to prosecute & they don't want the states to prosecute either. So ID theft is illegal if you are a citizen & okay if you are not. No wonder outsiders think US law is a joke.
State officials highlight the precedent of allowing 'unlawful workers' exemption from state prosecutions.
Why aren’t the feds prosecuting the fraudulent use of the SSN? Why did the state have to do something?
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Brewers warn Supreme Court: Back the Clean Water Act, or beer will taste like medicineThe Supreme Court will hear arguments early next month in a major environment case concerning the Clean Water Act. US macrobrews taste like medicine now. Brett Kavanaugh when he sees this And all of that after losing the NationalLeague wild card game.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
The Supreme Court Case Testing the Limits of Gorsuch’s TextualismIf Justice Neil Gorsuch rules against LGBTQ protections, he’ll be admitting that, deep down, he knows his judicial philosophy is deeply flawed
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court Appears Likely to Back Structure of Puerto Rico Debt-Relief BoardThe Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to uphold the special board that Congress created to resolve Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, despite claims from creditors that its members were wrongly appointed.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court Weighs State Identity-Fraud Charges Against Immigrant Job SeekersThe Supreme Court on Wednesday explored whether states can prosecute undocumented immigrants for identity theft when they provide false social security numbers or other information when applying for jobs. It's still fraud and it should be prosecuted. *illegal FIFY So...we are Nazi Germany now! And Trump is Fuhrer, ah? This can come up because children are in cages!
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court debates life without parole sentence in DC sniper caseThe Supreme Court wrestled with the sentence of life without parole in the DC sniper case, discussing the impact of their own prior cases as well as the details concerning Virginia's sentencing scheme When i was 8 or 9, no one could have convinced me to do what he did. Sorry. Sentences (usually) should stick and not leave victims wondering if 'one day.'
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court justices skeptical about voiding Puerto Rico board appointmentsU.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday signaled reluctance to overturn appointme...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »