Man successfully sues cheating wife's lover for £600k using long forgotten 'homewrecker' law

  • 📰 TheSun
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 61%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A JILTED husband has successfully sued his ex-wife’s new lover for $750, 000 (£606,506) thanks to an old “homewrecker law.” Kevin Howard from North Carolina was married for 12 yea…

A JILTED husband has successfully sued his ex-wife's new lover for $750, 000 thanks to an old "homewrecker law."

It allows the spouse to sue another person for "purposefully interfering with the marital relationship,"In the same way that a man could sue for the theft of a horse, he could sue for the theft of a wife. Now, any spouse can sue regardless of their gender or their partner.Allows a person to bring action against a third-party alleged to be respinsible for the breakdown of their marriage

Not necessary to show the person set out to destroy the relationship, only that they intentionally engages in acts which would impact the marriageHoward took the decision after attending marriage counselling with his ex-wife and realising that something wasn't quite right.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Nice

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 64. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Man who does not understand consent has right to pursue sex, court rulesJudge finds against care plan for 36-year-old who has autism with impaired cognition And we’re not suppose to question judges?! Everyone’s going to yell at me for this, but I’m actually far more informed on this most any of you anyway: this was the correct decision for the court to make. Do the courts not have a duty to protect the public? Sometimes people have rights curtailed to protect the general public but not in this case.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »