Women not entitled to pension age change compensation, high court rules

  • 📰 The Guardian
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Women born in 1950s not entitled to restitution over pension age rise, say judges

Almost 4 million women born in the 1950s are not entitled to restitution for money they lost out on when the pension age was raised from 60 to 66, the high court has decided.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Next: European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)? But PLEASE include 1960s born women -some in same class at school+faced lack of notice, same discrimination in empl+also less able to get F/T substv jobs with empl'r pension -many had P/T or FixedTerm contracts, excluded from pension.

Predictable. Judges, whether male or female, have their own pension arrangements, paid by taxpayers.

Now, will Johnson defy the high court for extra votes? That is the question. bbc5live Emmabarnett

Should have opened their letters

Disgraceful!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 84. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines