NAN reports that Dike in her petition sought for the dissolution of the purported marriage through Sections 3 and 34 of the Matrimonial Cause Act.
The judge further averred that Ajaero, the respondent who was served with court processes, including hearing notices did not file nor answer to the petition, but had legal representation and neither did he challenge the evidence of the petitioner, rather he rested his case on that of the petitioner. Agbaza concluded and said “because the evidence brought by the petitioner was not challenged by the respondent, “this petition succeeds and judgment is accordingly entered in favour of the petitioner in the following terms.
She further submitted that, however, when she traveled to Germany to see the respondent, instead of taking her to the address she knew he lived, he took her to a different address.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: MobilePunch - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Source: TheNationNews - 🏆 6. / 69 Read more »
Source: TheNationNews - 🏆 6. / 69 Read more »