My initial thought was that as parliament has proven it can defend itself on this matter, by passing legislation to force the PM to extend the Brexit deadline if he doesn't get a deal, the court might decide it should not intervene in this instance.There's a problem with this assumption. Firstly, the Supreme Court only concerns itself with the law, not with what will best bring together two divided groups of protesters.
However, a week earlier the High Court of England and Wales rejected a similar case, saying the matter was political and not something judges should interfere in. "But if parliament has been suspended and prevented from doing its job of scrutinising government then courts can step in, if it's being done for unlawful purpose and they found it had been done deliberately to prevent parliamentary scrutiny."But the circumstance of this prorogation is also a factor. The looming Brexit deadline is an essential part of the case.
Nope and they won't wish to get involved in politics, they will rule its not a legal matter.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court challenge over PM's Parliament suspension - BBC News“We are not concerned with the wider political issues which form the context for this legal issue” The UK Supreme Court begins hearing the two appeals over Parliament’s suspension, making clear the hearings are not about Brexit Don’t take all day, the answer obvious . No BBCPolitics But the whole basis of the case is about Remaining in the EU. If they wanted to leave they would have voted for a deal. Irrelevant case as it’s on the basis of one political view over another political view! If they want to change it, hold an election! simples BBCPolitics It is about Brexit though. That's the whole point. It is obvious parliament has been prorogued because of Brexit. Ignoring that means the prorogation was lawful. Oh well. Kinda guessed this would be the case, but I still thought our law worked on a case by case basis?
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Lord causes confusion after claiming that Boris Johnson has taken a 'hammer and sickle' to our political cultureLord Sumption, a former UK Supreme Court judge, has claimed that Boris Johnson is taking a 'hammer and sickle' to our political culture in a bizarre claim which has caused widespread confusion ''hammer and sickle' to our political culture'' - That would be Jo Swinson. Who is this guy. Labour Co . Is doing that?
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Brexit latest news: Boris accused of 'improper' prorogation on first day of Supreme Court hearingBoris Johnson has been accused of proroguing Parliament for political reasons with an "improper motive" at the opening of a Supreme Court Case today.
Source: The Telegraph - 🏆 41. / 63 Read more »
Brexit court LIVE: 'They got it wrong, we're right' Gina Miller lawyer hits out at judgesTHE SUPREME COURT began hearing arguments that Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue Parliament was unlawful today, with Gina Miller’s lawyer arguing the English High Court was wrong to throw out the Remainer’s initial legal challenge.
Source: Daily Express - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »
Boris Johnson warns Supreme Court Justices to stay out of the 'political arena'For the second time in as many years, Britain’s future was placed in the hands of 11 Supreme Court Justices on Tuesday as the extent of the Prime Minister’s powers were put to the ultimate test. FXDIRK He will not stop, no deal brexit is coming no matter what
Source: The Telegraph - 🏆 41. / 63 Read more »
Boris Johnson holds breath as Brexit prorogation row hits Supreme Court - latestTHE SUPREME COURT will today begin considering whether Boris Johnson broke the law by suspending Parliament in the run up to Brexit.
Source: Daily Express - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »