In an opinion piece published in the Daily Beast Monday, Rocah wrote that Barr could run interference in the new Epstein case because he is the head of the whole Justice Department, including the Southern District of New York, which she said is playfully called the"Sovereign" district.
Rocah noted that Barr in his confirmation hearings said he might recuse himself from matters relating to Epstein because of the Kirkland & Ellis affiliation."Now would be a good time to know if Barr followed through on that," Rocah wrote. Trump added that Acosta has been"just an excellent secretary of labor" and that he will be looking"very closely" at Epstein's first case.
What is the argument for him to recuse?
It must be true, CNN helped with story.
That was Barr's deal with Trump
they had confidence before
What? Get lost
Now do KimFoxx
.realDonaldTrump told him to 'unrecuse' himself.
He shouldn’t
Experts? Lmao
Maybe Barr used Epstein’s pimping service in the past.
Aah...BUT, 'legal experts' have full confidence in William Barr, as well.
'Legal Experts'? The same news source that thought Avenatti was a legal expert
According to other reports, he did recuse himself. Not sure what the truth is at this point!
Absolutely zero!
Legal experts = 2 left wing media analysts, what a fucking joke
What is the over/under on how fast Barr gets this Chester back on the street to re-offend?
why would he need to recuse himself?
I have zero confidence in James Comey's daughter being on the prosecuting team
Legal experts that sit back and eat popcorn 🍿
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Attorney General William Barr recused from Epstein case over legal conflict: Report'I am recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm I subsequently joined for a period of time,' Barr told reporters on Monday. oh trump is gonna have a fit his boss is gonna be PISSED! BarrEpsteinVirus
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Barr says he sees a legal path for census citizenship queryAttorney General William Barr told the AP that he sees a legal pathway to adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census, despite a Supreme Court ruling that blocked its inclusion, at least temporarily. Who gives a shit about what Barr says! Of course BassettHoundBarr sees a path to adding the question. It is what his Lord and Master wants. The Supreme Court and Congress be damned which they should be since the never stand up to our Supreme Leader. Of course he does. Laws, SCOTUS. Who cares. Unimportant.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
AG Bill Barr sees legal path to census citizenship questionLess than 3 weeks after the Supreme Court said no, Attorney General Bill Barr says he has a plan to get the citizenship question included on the 2020 census. Executive Director of U.S. Programs of the Human Rights Watch, Nicole Austin-Hillery, and former Congressman David Jolly join Stephanie Ruhle to explain. ¿Can Barr overrule the Supreme Court? AG Barr tells the AP that he sees a legal path to breaking the law...
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Barr sees a way for census to legally ask about citizenshipAttorney General William Barr said Monday he sees a way to legally require 2020 census respondents to declare whether or not they are citizens, despite a Supreme Court ruling that forbade asking the question. In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said the Trump administration will take action It's a good, fair, honest question to quantify our current state. It's not like Congress is doing anything! noincumbents
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Barr Sees a Path to Legally Add Census Citizenship QuestionAttorney General William Barr said he expects to find a legal way to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, less than a week after the Justice Department said it would drop the attempt in the wake of a Supreme Court decision blocking it. DevinNunes GOP SenateGOP thehill RepAdamSchiff FoxNews CNN NRA POTUS washingtonpost AP TheBeatWithAri USArmy NGA_GEOINT FBI FBIWFO USNavy NSAGov NewYorkFBI usarmycentral CIA DCPoliceDept DeptofDefense TheJusticeDept thejointstaff SpeakerPelosi Pos So does that mean legal immigrants that pay taxes no longer have to pay them? No taxation without representation. It’s in the constitution.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »