The warning urges Chinese citizens and Chinese-funded bodies in the U.S. to step up their safety awareness and preventative measures and respond "appropriately and actively." It was issued by the Foreign Ministry, as well as the Chinese Embassy and consulates in the U.S.
Also Tuesday, China's Ministry of Culture and Tourism issued its own travel alert for the U.S., noting the high frequency of shootings, robberies and theft in the country. Chinese students abroad were also urged Monday to assess the risks involved given tightened visa restrictions.Chinese social media has been abuzz with talk of U.S.
And they don't harass their own?
Right...because China hasn’t arrested any Canadians lately....
So disappointing the Chinese is exercising some restraints... What about canceling of agricultural orders? that'd be more effective. wimps!!!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Canada, Britain worried about citizens as Hong Kong offers China new extradition powersA pro-China Hong Kong government recently proposed a law that would newly allow the Chinese authoritarian state to demand the surrender of individuals from the commercial hub to the mainland Again, don't do stupidity abroad.
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »
Chrystia Freeland was urged to tell China to stop ‘inaccurate’ talk about Canada’s justice systemThe note from Global Affairs urges the foreign affairs minister to deliver a key message: Canada is treating Meng Wanzhou better than Kovrig and Spavor “The call never happened.” This is a puff piece about all the tough things she would have said if anyone took her seriously in the first place. 😂 As for “inaccurate” talk about our justice system, it seems fair to characterize it as fully politicized, and two tiered. . ban Huawei . extradite Meng . China’s biggest concern is valid. Does the current government have two definitions for the Rule of Law. 1) Where the government will not intervene or interfere with a legal case and or 2) where government favour can be bought and intervention can be obtained. 🤔
Source: nationalpost - 🏆 10. / 80 Read more »