'Decades overdue': Equality groups call for election debate on women's rights

  • 📰 CTVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 99%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

NDP and Green Party leaders Jagmeet Singh and Elizabeth May committed Wednesday to a debate on women’s issues organized by a coalition called Up For Debate, which cancelled a similar debate in 2015 after Stephen Harper and Thomas Mulcair said they wouldn’t participate.

NDP and Green Party leaders Jagmeet Singh and Elizabeth May committed Wednesday to a debate on women’s issues organized by a coalition called Up For Debate. NDP and Green Party leaders committed Wednesday to a debate on women’s issues ahead of the 2019 election.

“Last election we had Up For Debate. I was ready. We’d all committed,” said Green Party leader Elizabeth May, noting key issues such as reproductive health, pay equity and child care. “These should not be even debatable issues in 2019,” she said. “I’m really thrilled to know that we have two party leaders here who are saying clearly, ‘We are up for debate. We’re not going anywhere.’”

The last leaders’ debate on gender equality was in 1984, according to Paulette Senior, President and CEO of Canadian Women’s Foundation, who spoke at the press conference in Ottawa. After the cancellation of the debate in 2015, the group instead shared pre-recorded“This debate is decades overdue,” she said. “While we are seeing extraordinary movement, awareness and calls for change, interest is no substitute for action.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

What rights do women not have in this country?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 1. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. city debates 'saggy pants' law after man shoots himselfA Louisiana man's death during a police confrontation has sparked debate over the city of Shreveport's law banning 'saggy pants.' They should make a law against stupidity, but then... Citizens: People keep getting shot in our city by people with guns and baggy pants Lawmaker: I know just what to do. Ban baggy pants Citizens: there are the guns too... Maybe... Lawmakers: BaN PNaTS! nOw!! I thought it would be a 'Florida man...' but I guess not. 🤪
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Louisiana debates 'Saggy pants' law after man shoots himselfOfficials in a Louisiana city are reconsidering a 2007 ordinance outlawing 'saggy pants' after a man's death in a confrontation with police. Is no one else surprised this wasn't something that happened in Alabama? Natural selection. Sometimes life lessons are learned through experience. Bet he changes his wardrobe, buys a holster or stoos carrying the firearm. Either way, no laws need to change. Maybe just don’t run from the cops....
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »

Scheer not backing down from pro-life past, but says he won't reopen abortion debateConservative Leader Andrew Scheer has said that if elected, his government would not enact an abortion law, but he has faced criticism for not saying whether he would let his MPs bring motions or private members bills that restrict abortion rights. Smart guy ... He is not 'pro-life.' Stop using that term, please. That's too bad.
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »