Kamala Harris Wants The Department Of Justice To Stop States From Passing Restrictive Abortion Laws

have said they want to pass a law that would codify the landmark Supreme Court ruling — a “safety” net, of sorts, if, Harris’s campaign said, “simply... isn’t enough”; states could still pass restrictive laws, which would then have to be challenged by courts. Like the law codifying, Harris’s Reproductive Rights Act would have a slim chance chance of passing Congress with 60 votes in the Senate.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker have also released abortion rights plans that go beyond solidifyinginto federal law. Booker said he would create an “Office of Reproductive Freedoms” within the White House, and Warren promised a series of executive orders to roll back Trump administration rules.

But Harris’s plan is unique for the role it envisions for the Department of Justice on the front lines of stopping state-level abortion restrictions — something Democrats have been trying to do for years as more and more states chip away atA bill co-sponsored by Harris and many other Senate Democrats, the Women's Health Protection Act, lays out the basis by which Harris’s campaign says the DOJ would judge state laws — prohibiting states from banning abortions before fetal viability, a...

Harris, who served as California’s attorney general, has in part based her campaign, on her prosecutorial background, including a focus on policy wielding the power of the DOJ, the government’s law enforcement agency, in new and different ways. She has said she wants to use the DOJ to combat violent extremism, including white nationalism, by doubling the agency’s civil rights division, and would command up the agency’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to revoke licenses of gun dealers who break the law.

I guess she’s forgetting about states rights

Gotta keep the darkies in check, right?

States rights, it’s in the constitution

I’m confused. So in the US the Department Of Health & Human Services is federal, right? Why then can any state make any laws regarding health then given it’s under federal jurisdiction?

Infanticide has no place in Civilized Society. The Barbaric practice of abortion must end. We can not move forward as long as those among us cling to such pagan and regressive practices.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Abortion rights advocates protest to 'stop the bans' as more states pass fetal heartbeat billsAbortion rights supporters gathered at statehouses, town squares and courthouses across the United States in a show of opposition to a wave of laws attempting to sharply restrict abortion I think that women should vote on what women should be able to do with their bodies and men should vote on what men should be able to do with their bodies. Is that sexist🙂🙂🙂 As of yet so does every state. They just feel differently about the morality of procrastination when it comes to a potential human life. A viable fetus should never die at the hand of a doctor. Viability secures it’s basic human rights. Pro Choice is OK so long as it's a baby derived from incest, rape or may cause physical harm to the mother...anything else is immoral.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Abortion rights activists protest restrictive new laws across the countryAbortion rights activists across the country take to the streets to protest recent wave of restrictive state laws. Why stop at abortions? Let’s do a purge of all the unwanted babies once a year to get rid of them. Maybe a big dumpster fire? That may be just as humane. is fake news. millionpeoplemarchtoimpeach makeamericaunitedpeaceful (5/7)Republican Lawmakers in Alabama have revoked the freedom of right form woman, just like countries in Asia, Middle East where Woman has been raped, slaughtered, tortured, and treated woman as slave for over centuries!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Federal judge blocks Mississippi 'heartbeat' abortion bill, six months after enjoining less-restrictive law'Here we go again,' wrote U.S. District Court Judge Carlton Reeves in his order granting the injunction. Yup and if PhilBryantMS will take it to SCOTUS the whole deal will get ended permanently for everyone. The judge was so over it. Yet another judge overstepping their bounds. Bring back the Rule of Law.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »