A Billionaires’ Row Building Notches Penthouse Sale Despite Legal Woes

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 63%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Despite legal woes, a Manhattan building on Billionaire's Row sells a penthouse for 'close to' its $58 million asking price

A penthouse apartment at 111 West 57th Street, a new luxury development on New York’s Billionaires’ Row that has been at the center of two high profile legal battles, is in contract to sell for “close to” its asking price of $58 million, according to the developer.

The home—a 7,175-square-foot duplex with three bedrooms—is the one of the two most expensive listings to go into contract in New York so far this year, according to research by Manhattan real-estate firm Olshan Realty. A penthouse at 212 Fifth Avenue, which was...

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It's only money.

Who cares? I am happy. Beautiful home by Mt. Baldy in So CA. 1/2 acre. Pool. 2 fire places. No rats 🐀 as in NY🤣🤣😂😂

Just the view is worth $30 million...

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

A Billionaire’s Row Building Notches Penthouse Sale Despite Legal WoesA unit at 111 West 57th Street, which plays a role in two high profile lawsuits, sells for ‘close to’ its $58 million asking price. casey ur apartment sold lol . Perhaps the building was allotted by Ben Carson for Section 8 housing.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Thousands of Czechs protest for fourth week against justice ministerThousands of Czechs protested for a fourth week in a row on Tuesday against a ju... Where?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »