John Paul Stevens looks back on nearly a century of life and law, but worries about the future

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 71 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The long-serving justice has written a memoir and says he is concerned about the Supreme Court’s direction on issues he thought were already settled.

By Robert Barnes Robert Barnes Reporter covering the U.S. Supreme Court Email Bio Follow May 11 at 3:06 PM FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — John Paul Stevens spent more than a third of his near-century on Earth at the Supreme Court, where he often was on a different page from a majority of his fellow justices.

Heller and the Second Amendment, Stevens said in the interview, produce “such disastrous practical effects. I think there’s no need for all the guns we have in the country and if I could get rid of one thing it would be to get rid of that whole gun climate.” He does wonder why it is so challenging for his former colleagues to recognize that partisan gerrymandering is a constitutional violation, as they do with racial gerrymandering. “It’s the same issue,” he said. “Public officials, including state legislators, have a duty to act impartially. The whole point [of partisan gerrymandering] is to create an unfair result.”

The memoir is a tale of a privileged childhood in Chicago, the ravages of the Great Depression and a family scandal, service as a wartime cryptologist and a charmed legal career as a Supreme Court clerk, appeals court judge and the third-longest-serving justice in the court’s history. It was during a dinner at the French Embassy in Washington when Stevens and his wife, Maryan, were seated with Bernstein, who had just conducted the Orchestre National de France at the Kennedy Center. Maryan wondered about the emotions that accompany performing a masterpiece.

“Firsthand knowledge of the criminal justice’s fallibility” made Stevens skeptical for the rest of his career, he said. “The system is not perfect — it’s pretty good, but it’s not perfect.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Join the club.

We're totally fcked. What's there to worry about?

Kayleigh McEnany: The notion of impeachment is laughable via YouTube

В СЛУХАХ ИРШАВЫ АДМИНА СМЕНИ , ЧТО БЫ МЕНЯ ТАМ РАЗБЛОКИРОВАТЬ

No shit.

And I thank God every day that he is retired!

Because man is million's of years older than God, we have all these problems?

He's still alive and kicking! 😮

We are all worried

When Harvard is firing professors for repping Weinstein he should be worried

What a treasure.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

John Paul Stevens Worries About the Court'The president is exercising powers that do not really belong to him.' Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wants his former colleagues to adhere to precedent. What power is he executing? duh This guy came up with Chevron deference.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Retired Supreme Court Justice: Trump 'exercising powers that do not really belong to him'Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens accused President Donald Trump of exceeding his presidential powers in an interview published Thursday, telling The Wall Street Journal that the President 'has to comply with subpoenas.' While many on the hill have complied with absolutely nothing ..... criminals running the show ! And he would know!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »