The court heard in February testimony from Westport Police Corporal Shawn Wong Won who said he clearly saw Mr Stiber talking into a black mobile phone with an illuminated handset.
But Mr Stiber’s lawyer John Thygerson produced phone records which showed that his client was not speaking on the phone at the time that he was pulled over. Mr Stiber’s car also had Bluetooth capabilities which meant he was able to talk on the phone hands-free if a call came in, Mr Thygerson said.hour of a 16-hour double shift, raising the possibility that fatigue could have been a factor in making the mistake, the lawyer said.
In his verdict, the judge decided that the state had been unable to meet its burden of proof, and was unable to show that Mr Stiber was actually talking on his phone. "It was the case of the century," Mr Thygerson, said of the court’s decision. "He was quite pleased. Obviously, he was quite pleased."
eating is just as distracting and dangerous
Seriously how did he lose his case the first time with phone records showing no calls?
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »