Why Did the Supreme Court Allow Public Sleeping Bans on Homeless People?

  • 📰 AllSidesNow
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 62 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

See multiple perspectives from The Seattle Times, Washington Examiner, and Bloomberg at AllSides.com.

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that cities may enforce a ban on sleeping in public places. The 6-3 decision does not require cities to enforce the ban, but it allows for legal action to be used on those who violate cities’ individual laws. The controversial ruling was authored by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump. It reversed a California ruling that found most such bans to be “cruel and unusual punishment” under the.

The Supreme Court’s decision in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson will save lives by allowing local governments and law enforcement agencies to determine how best to respond to homelessness in their own communities. In many cases, that will mean intervening in homeless encampments that are dangerous both to the people living in them and nearby communities.

The overreach of the federal court system into local homeless policy over the last six years has proven disastrous in the Western United States. Encampments have been allowed to grow while state and local governments have been left...On Friday, the United States Supreme Court found that it is constitutional to jail people simply because they are homeless. Their decision, in City of Grants Pass v.

Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison, whose office submitted briefing in the case in support of the Court’s decision, has embraced this opportunity to further punish the most vulnerable people in our community for their struggles with poverty, their mental illness and...In a defeat for advocates of the unhoused, the US Supreme Court has rejected the argument that it is cruel and unusual punishment to outlaw sleeping outdoors in urban spaces.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 572. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

US Supreme Court Latest: Court sends Trump’s immunity case back to lower courtThe New Black View
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »

US Supreme Court Latest: Court sends Trump’s immunity case back to lower courtThe justices take the bench today to release their last few opinions of the term, including a closely watched case: Whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution for …
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court's decision overruling Chevron and limiting federal agencies is so significantThe Supreme Court overruled a 40-year-old decision that said federal courts should defer to agencies in certain cases. Here's what it means.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court may be releasing decisions unusually late this yearAva-joye Burnett is an award-winning journalist who joined Scripps News in April of 2023. Prior to Scripps News, Ava-joye spent seven years as a general assignment reporter at CBS Baltimore (WJZ).
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »

LARRY KUDLOW: Why is President Biden so 'intent on disrespecting' the Supreme Court?FOX Business host Larry Kudlow says President Biden is not abiding by the law regarding the cancelation of student loans on Tuesday's 'Kudlow.'
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court saved a domestic violence gun lawNicolle Wallace with reaction to the decision from the Supreme Court’s ruling today regarding restricting domestic abusers from owning firearms and what it says about the lone dissenting justice, Clarence Thomas being in favor of violent, dangerous abusers having a legal right to a deadly weapon, in the name of the second amendment.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »