The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of Charles McCrory, who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.MONTGOMERY, Ala. — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida manafter spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: aldotcom - 🏆 82. / 68 Read more »
Source: FOX10News - 🏆 581. / 51 Read more »
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »