Matters like antitrust cases against AI players, Adobe's subscription mess, and net neutrality could be decided by judges – not expertsThe US Supreme Court has ruled that the judges should no longer defer to government agency interpretations of ambiguous laws – a decision with potential ramifications for some of the biggest cases against tech companies.
Justice Elena Kagan, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, characterized the ruling as a judicial power grab, because it invites judges to make determinations previously trusted to government agencies and expert staff. The Natural Resources Defense Council – the progressive environment group that lost in the 1984 Chevron case – warned the end of Chevron deference is a recipe for chaos, because judges all over the county will be called upon to interpret ambiguous laws.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US Supreme Court sends Trump immunity case back to lower courtThe move all but ends prospects the former US president could be tried before the country’s November election.
Source: Observer_Owl - 🏆 18. / 72 Read more »
US Supreme Court sends Trump immunity case back to lower courtThe move all but ends prospects the former US president could be tried before the country’s November election.
Source: Glasgow_Times - 🏆 76. / 59 Read more »
Source: FT - 🏆 113. / 51 Read more »
Source: NewsMedical - 🏆 19. / 71 Read more »
Source: OilandEnergy - 🏆 34. / 68 Read more »
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »