Trump didn’t get everything he asked for from the Supreme Court—but only because he asked for so, so much, including that a criminal trial might not be possible absent an impeachment conviction. Trump got more than enough to turn the January 6th indictment brought against him by Jack Smith in Washington, D.C., into, at best, a shard of its former self.
” It also ruled that most of a President’s communications with the public, if not all of them, likely fell “comfortably” within at least the “outer perimeter” of his official acts. And, in a final, legally baffling move, the majority ruled that Trump’s official acts could not even be introduced as evidence in a trial against him. That last turn was too much even for Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who declined to join in the section of the ruling on evidence.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court returns Trump immunity case to lower courtsRuling says former presidents do not have immunity for unofficial acts. Lower courts will apply the standard to charges that Trump plotted to overturn his...
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Trump VP Contender Byron Donalds Says Supreme Court Should Intervene on Trump’s Guilty ConvictionHe unsurprisingly believes the hush money case was all about election “interference.”
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »
Supreme Court knocks down Wall Street regulator’s in-house courtsThe justices backed a challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s internal tribunals — a resounding win for conservatives.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court punts social media moderation cases back to lower courtsThe Supreme Court on Monday wiped existing rulings, kicked social media moderation cases back to lower courts
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »