Analysis: 4 takeaways from the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity decision

By Aaron Blake, The Washington PostA police officer stands near the security gate at the Supreme Court in Washington on Monday. that former president Donald Trump and other presidents enjoy a significant degree of immunity for actions taken as president, in a decision that could reverberate not just in Trump’s criminal cases but also for future presidents.

- It ruled that he is presumed immune from prosecution for pressuring then-Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the election on Jan. 6, 2021, because Trump’s acts “involve official conduct.” It said the burden is on the government to prove that prosecuting Trump for this wouldn’t “pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”

She added: “To make sense of charges alleging a quid pro quo, the jury must be allowed to hear about both the quid and the quo, even if the quo, standing alone, could not be a basis for the President’s criminal liability.”While Trump can still technically be prosecuted, the decision will lead to plenty of uncertainty and - most crucially for the 2024 election - probably delay matters even further. Trump wasn’t expected to face trial before the election; this reduces whatever chance existed.

It’s tempting to view this decision in the context of Trump’s trials, because that’s the immediate concern. But it will also have far-reaching implications for future presidents, including for a potential second Trump term. Sotomayor added: “The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court returns Trump immunity case to lower courtsRuling says former presidents do not have immunity for unofficial acts. Lower courts will apply the standard to charges that Trump plotted to overturn his...
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »

Trump VP Contender Byron Donalds Says Supreme Court Should Intervene on Trump’s Guilty ConvictionHe unsurprisingly believes the hush money case was all about election “interference.”
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »

Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court knocks down Wall Street regulator’s in-house courtsThe justices backed a challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s internal tribunals — a resounding win for conservatives.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Dauphin County President Judge will appoint temporary Clerk of Courts: Supreme CourtDauphin County President Judge Scott A. Evans will be responsible for appointing a temporary acting Clerk of Courts until Pa. Governor Josh Shapiro appoints an acting clerk.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »